this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
88 points (96.8% liked)

Europe

8128 readers
565 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Wow, so even the conservatives now realized that if you leave no legal avenue for migrants, they will simply come here illegally?

But let's not get too crazy. If you flee your country with no way of obtaining a work permit in your country, you are still screwed.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not exactly. Immigrants without valuable skills will go illegally; those with valuable skills will just go somewhere else or not bother and that's not good for the labor-hungry European economy.

[–] pendel@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

And they will still end up cleaning your toilet and flipping my burger and deliver my food. I don’t get this obsession with "skilled labor“.

Humans like any other animal have been moving around ever since and only recently we as a species have developed this idea of imaginary borders and sense of entitlement to the place we randomly got thrown into without any doing of our own.

Even ignoring the humanistic aspect of this morally rotten debate, seriously, who’s gonna do all the shitty work that nobody wants to do? I don’t want to be a cleaner or work at McDonald’s in bumfuck nowhere next to a highway or work for a moving company or be a plumber.

It’s not even about money, I will just never want to do it and there’s not enough people in any of these jobs and many more even though we’re in an economic downturn period.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

And they will still end up cleaning your toilet and flipping my burger and deliver my food

I'm not talking about those, but the ones coding your web portals and prescribing your medicine. Tight immigration policy can effectively deter these people, which would be a detriment to European economies because of declining birthrates. See: Japan and South Korea. In 2025 Germany needs Syrian doctors more than Syrian doctors need Germany, that's my point here.

It’s not even about money, I will just never want to do it and there’s not enough people in any of these jobs and many more even though we’re in an economic downturn period.

I totally agree on the moral front, but it is about the money. The reason there aren't enough people in these jobs is that they don't pay a living wage, not that they're inherently icky.

[–] Quittenbrot@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Humans like any other animal have been moving around ever since and only recently we as a species have developed this idea of imaginary borders and sense of entitlement to the place we randomly got thrown into without any doing of our own.

You'll obviously find the concept of herds and territories also in animals, to be fair.

Also, given that we humans no longer only cater for ourselves and our direct surroundings, but luckily through social security systems also for people we don't know at all and never will but who are part of our "peer group called 'nation'", there has to be a line drawn to specify this group. Especially, since there is a very strict line drawn where our jurisdiction applies. I understand your humanistic and moral thinking, but still see these real obstacles in the way.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I feel you're responding to a child who has no notion of human behavior or evolution. Read their comment and decided they were too hopelessly ignorant and naive to respond to. You wrote a great response though!

[–] deHaga@feddit.uk 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Why bring skills? Why not train people?

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Birthrate in Europe is declining

[–] deHaga@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I thought automation was going to take all the jobs? Seems like one problem solves the other

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Robots don't pay taxes, health insurance or into the retirement fund that old people will need.

[–] deHaga@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

We've never ran out of jobs though

That's exactly the point. Taxes aren't the problem either. Unpaid taxes are.

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago

And have them demand to be paid? Sheesh.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And what sort of skills are we talking about? It's not like most of the migrants coming illegally now are doctors and surgeons. That's a very very tiny portion and I'm willing to bet they are already much more likely to have avenues to come in legally. Highly skilled, university trained people aren't the ones crowding the migrant boats.

[–] richardwonka@mas.to 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

@Saapas
Been having a deep draught of the “illegals!!” Kool-Aid, have we?

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have no idea what you're trying to say with this one tbh

[–] pendel@feddit.org -1 points 1 week ago

I think it boils down to you being a dick

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Got an honest rebuttal? Anything said there was false? Love to hear it! (You got nothing and you know it. That's why you changed the subject and picked a single word out to rebut.)

"Illegal" does not mean "criminal". Running a stop sign is illegal. It does not make me a criminal.

Or do you have some fancy new word for people that cross borders in contradiction to law? Love to hear it!

[–] mjr@infosec.pub 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't you need skilled people to train others?

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago

Hush, don't disturb their xenophobia with rational thought

[–] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

Von der Leyen talking about skills. Just my kind of humour.

[–] oyzmo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How is this a good thing for EU citizens? Are there lots of these jobs now in need of workers that is not available? Or will many EU workers loose their jobs as firms shift to cheap immigrant workers?

[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

The economy adapts to the supply of workers, and as the UK found out after brexit, if you restrict the supply of workers the work generally goes away.

They had produce rotting in the fields because they couldn't find workers and the locals weren't interested in that kind of work. Raising salaries wasn't an option because consumers weren't interested in paying more. Economics is fun, isn't it?

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are there lots of these jobs now in need of workers

Yes, very much so, practically on every level.

[–] oyzmo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Then it -is- a good thing 😁👌🏻

[–] Anonymaus@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] CAVOK@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Now let a qualified person say it.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Did we learn nothing from 2015?

Stop the brain drain from countries that needs their educated people at home.

This is just white savior crap with the added effect of causing developing nations to take longer to develop.

I strongly believe that to improve a country you need educated citizens, we should absolutely help developing nations with offering free/reduced cost education to citizens of developing countries so they get an educated workforce with a strong network of connections that will aid cooperation and development.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I strongly believe that to improve a country you need educated citizens

True, but you also need cooperative authorities willing to give their educated citizens the leeway to prosper. That's the real bottleneck here; plenty of developing countries have accessible higher education. If you want the EU to help developing countries develop, you should start from neocolonialism. Many of the regimes holding back developing countries are basically running on foreign dollars and euros.

[–] cliffracer_cloaka@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

True, but you also need cooperative authorities willing to give their educated citizens the leeway to prosper.

Education is a precursor to that.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

Again, that is already present in plenty of (unsure if most) developing countries, and the ones where it isn't aren't common sources of brain drain. There's a reason the West tends to import Indians and Iranians rather than, say, Congolese; the majority of educated people from any country will stay there, either because they don't want to leave or because they can't find an opportunity to do so. This is simply not the bottleneck holding back the Global South; education is one of the few things a developing country can do more of with minimal effort.

[–] CybranM@feddit.nu 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's the crux with developing countries. If a citizen can make 20x their salary somewhere else why wouldn't they?

Should we block people from emigrating? Is limiting their freedom good for us/them?

It's a tricky question because like you say in the long term their home country would most likely benefit from them staying.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

There is a way to deal with it.

Have the country pay for the education abroad, but have the person be required to work 10 years in the country to recieve their diploma.

After that they are welcome to move as they please.

[–] poVoq@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Most developing countries don't have a brain drain problem but a capital problem. Remittances from people that moved abroad are a strong factor helping with that and are bigger than the official development assistance for example.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago

That is a good point I had not considered.

If there is not a brain drain issue then I will concede that my point is not valid.

[–] pendel@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago

Stop being a snowflake, if you’re too cucked to avoid being replaced by a brown person that’s strong beta vibes I‘m sensing and that sounds like a you problem.

Hope I got the language right. In all seriousness though the whole 2015 migration trope was a right wing psy-op and you fell for it, congratulations. I live in Germany and the only thing I learned is that Syrians can cook much better than you whoever you are.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The president of the European Commission proposes to focus on a hitherto little explored dimension, not least because, by definition, an economic migrant falls outside the concept of refugee and is not entitled to reception.

Those things are pretty much tied because economic migrants are abusing the refugee system to come to Europe. But having legal opportunities and being stricter about returning people back if they reach the shores would probably help the situation

Interesting photo to use for a discussion about skilled workers

[–] pendel@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago

Honestly I’m trying to find to find words that won’t break community rules but I’m struggling to find them. There are many places where you’ll find people sharing your point of view, this is not one of them and I’d like to keep it that way.