this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2025
898 points (98.9% liked)

Science Memes

17476 readers
2227 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

I just realized…

I don’t like fusion.

They say it’s clean, but 14.1 MeV neutrons are no joke.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_temperature#Fast

14.1 MeV neutrons have about 10 times as much energy as fission neutrons, and they are very effective at fissioning even non-fissile heavy nuclei. These high-energy fissions also produce more neutrons on average than fissions by lower-energy neutrons. D–T fusion neutron sources, such as proposed tokamak power reactors, are therefore useful for transmutation of transuranic waste. 14.1 MeV neutrons can also produce neutrons by knocking them loose from nuclei.

On the other hand, these very high-energy neutrons are less likely to simply be captured without causing fission or spallation. For these reasons, nuclear weapon design extensively uses D–T fusion 14.1 MeV neutrons to cause more fission. Fusion neutrons are able to cause fission in ordinarily non-fissile materials, such as depleted uranium (uranium-238), and these materials have been used in the jackets of thermonuclear weapons. Fusion neutrons also can cause fission in substances that are unsuitable or difficult to make into primary fission bombs, such as reactor grade plutonium. This physical fact thus causes ordinary non-weapons grade materials to become of concern in certain nuclear proliferation discussions and treaties.

How are reaction chambers supposed to deal with that? It’s not very sustainable if the whole assembly breaks down and turns radioactive over time.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 4 hours ago

I'm sure there is a good reason why fission has always been "5-10 years till it's ready"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

Boiling water, all the way down. Somebody get the loose leaf

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›