this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
248 points (99.2% liked)

World News

50886 readers
1927 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/53408652

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 64 points 2 days ago (1 children)

US Farmers having the day they voted for:

collapsed inline media

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They were voting for subsidies

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 33 points 2 days ago (2 children)

US could always turn those soybeans into cheap food for the US.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Even give it away to starving families who lost their SNAP benefits during the shutdown.

But capitalists have to lie, çeat, & steal.

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 8 points 2 days ago (4 children)
[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Tax evasion, market manipulation, monopolies... etc.

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 6 points 2 days ago (35 children)
load more comments (35 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Giving things away for free en masse costs money. And the farmers are already going bankrupt from this. Big Ag will buy up that land cheap, and then the subsidies will be announced. Just like last time.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

Turning us all into soyboys?

Lol the irony would be pretty delicious.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago

Good. Fuck em. I'll sit back and enjoy while the rest of the world proceeds to set up a trade network that bypasses the U.S. entirely, fostering far more cooperation and goodwill than America's Hegemonic diplomacy ever has. America can get fucked for all I care.

[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

So much winning

[–] survirtual@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Soy farming is destructive to natural ecosystems. A shame for the farmers in the US, but the nature will be glad and that is more valuable. It does depend on the replacement crop.

I am worried about Brazilian's nature with the increasing soy farming. Soy needs terrain that competes with beautiful native plants, and with increasing production, more land will be lost, and more water consumed.

The good news is that soy farming makes more sense in Brazil. Higher rainfall means less diverted water. It is actually more ecologically cost effective. Hopefully there will not be much more forest displacement.

[–] kiagam@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Soyf farming and cattle ranching have been destroying the amazon for decades. It is severely diminished from that. But it is such a huge forest that it seems infinite.

The bigger problem is that the soil on the amazon is actually pretty bad. There is a thin fertile layer that gets renewed by the forest. Once you cut it down to plant something else it quickly becomes bad, so you have to cut down more forest to keep up production

[–] survirtual@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

It's true and very sad.

They claim the soy farming won't be allowed to deforest further, but the more land used for soy, the less for cattle. That can push cattle ranchers deeper into forested land and the effect is the same.

I hope this can be solved soon. The Amazon is a precious, ancient treasure of Earth.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 day ago

Soy farming restores nitrogen on soil. The alternative of using chemical processes to restore that nitrogen is stopping farming corn, and that's not happening.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 5 points 2 days ago

Good. Make it forever.

[–] verdi@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

For those asleep at the wheel: This is part of the plan, it's helping the last % points of a corporate takeover of the US primary sector that started over a decade ago. It's consolidation into monopolies. It's the US perestroika.

[–] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago

It's a bit confusing:

China Makes Biggest Soybean Buy From U.S. in Two Years

China made its biggest daily purchase of American soybeans in two years, in a move that ends a temporary pause and appears to signal a commitment to a trade truce reached late last month.

It would be interesting to know how this effects the people in China as the country is the world's largest importer not just of soybeans but of food in general. Is Brazil even able to fill the gap?

[–] card797@champserver.net 3 points 1 day ago

The deals are so good.

[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's just playing by Trump's own rules and winning hard. Good for them. Fuck the fascists above anything else.

load more comments
view more: next ›