this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
235 points (98.8% liked)

Canada

10678 readers
396 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Canada just lost its measles-free status. So here’s the question..

If an unvaccinated child spreads measles to someone else’s kid, why shouldn’t the parents be liable in small-claims court?

I’m not talking about criminal charges, just basic responsibility. If your choice creates the risk you should have to prove you weren’t the reason someone else’s child got sick.

Is that unreasonable?

(page 2) 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] n7gifmdn@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

Should they, yes, will they, not in the west.

[–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Felony murder, in my opinion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We're dangerously close to "it's illegal to be contagious".

[–] Yezzey@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

If there is no disease there is no contagious.

[–] bastion@feddit.nl -3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

this is the disturbing reality of the current attitude. People have no idea how important body sovereignty is.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The most disturbing thing about reality is that we have morons opting their children and neighbors into preventable diseases because of absurd lies they read on Facebook.

[–] bastion@feddit.nl -3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Nah. It's not concerning that otherwise intelligent people can't figure out how to deal with their own lives without resorting to controlling others.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] bastion@feddit.nl -1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm absolutely for the rights of people to either have or refuse vaccines. Of course, in your mind, that probably just equates to being an anti-vaxxer. I get vaccines when it makes sense to me to do so, which doesn't include all vaccines.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, honestly you are an anti-vaxxer if your personal feelings (or crackpot theories) negatively affect your perception of vaccine science even slightly. What you're expressing here is an idea that has killed countless people and it will only get worse. Everyone should thank you for bringing back measles though, because your valiant freedom fighting "helped" us in that way.

[–] bastion@feddit.nl -1 points 1 week ago

Crackpot theories.. ..like.. ... how evolution works? ..or how regressive evolution works?

Diseases have killed countless people, and we have multiple vectors (and should have multiple vectors) for addressing them.

We have technology, as in vaccines. This is a good thing.

We have social behaviors including social pressure (which is, unfortunately, often compulsive and not well-aimed by the people that exercise it, but such is life).

We have individual immunity, and the direct biological pressure for health and general genetic robustness, which is also a good thing, even though it kills some of us.

the cool thing is, we're now at a point where there are lots of anti-vaxxers who are totally willing to throw their lives away for the benefit of the species. ..and, their surviving genetic lines and the rest of the species, as their children interbreed with the rest of humanity, will be better off for it. That's true, whether you like it or not. It's also true that forcing vaccination rather than simply providing and incentivizing vaccination is a terribly, terribly flawed strategy which causes far more issues than it fixes.

I understand that you're making social-pressure arguments, and that they are valid in the context you're in. But they aren't the end-all be-all, and they're not fundamentally scientific (or even logical) just because you're trying to support science by using them.

I also know this whole conversation brings up tons of uncomfortable topics, for which I'll probably get yelled at. I just don't care, because being more forceful about an argument, or getting the last word, really has no bearing on the truth of that word.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rodsthencones@startrek.website -4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It opens some weird ideas to the game. If you are unvaccinated, yet previously had the illness and recovered, do you need a vaccine. What if you've been vaccinated and still spread it. What if you can't have the vaccines because if of health conditions. Anger does not fix the problem. We need a compromise, not a rule.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›