this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
234 points (99.6% liked)

Europe

7719 readers
901 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

https://archive.is/je5sj

“If adopted, these amendments would not simplify compliance but hollow out the GDPR’s and ePrivacy’s core guarantees: purpose limitation, accountability, and independent oversight,” Itxaso Dominguez de Olazabal, from the European Digital Rights group, told EUobserver.

The draft includes adjustments to what is considered “personal data,” a key component of the GDPR and protected by Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You know what would be good? If the browser asked you what you wanted to share, and then that was it. You didnt get asked by every single fucking website to accept fucking cookies. The website asks the browser, the browser tells them, and its all done. If youre gonna make changes, make that change.

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is what 'do not track' was for.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Do_Not_Track

It didn't work because it was up to the sites to read and respect the flag, which they did not.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

do not track was a "pweeease mister serwer uwu"-sorta move. there was no legal basis for it, and there was no technical backing. it would have been simple easy for browsers to just not send stuff that can be tracked (just check the eff panopticon site for how much superfluous stuff is just sent by the browser with every request), but instead the industry opted for the easier "here's all my stuff just as it was, and a little note that says 'don't look'". do not track was always a joke.

[–] Deebster@infosec.pub 10 points 1 day ago

Well we had the "do not track" header but almost everyone ignored it, and in the end it was removed from most browsers because ironically it just made tracking people easier.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not to kiss the boot of the Tim Cook led, fascist supporting corporation that is Apple. However, the IOS ecosystem does this. That “Ask App Not To Track” is deceptive in that it actually prevents a lot of data collection, though the “Ask” portion is hinged on the fact that Apple can not control everything an app does on their server side. You can configure, via your device settings, to always and automatically respond with “Yes” to this regardless of which app is asking.

[–] coolmojo@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

You can use the Consent-O-Matic extension for this. You set your preferences once and it auto fills the cookie pop up for you.

[–] kalapala@sopuli.xyz 33 points 1 day ago

It's a constant fight to keep personal data private. This is so fucked up.

[–] sp3ctre@feddit.org 24 points 1 day ago

Privacy is eroding. For the sellout of citizen data. F**king great.

[–] lornosaj@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Paywalled, so thanks for the arch link!

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

I find the proposed amendments to Article 9 particularly problematic ... And perfectly in line with AI bros telling you to make AI chatbots your friends while seeing them harvesting suicidal thoughts, self-reported depression symptoms and body dysmorphia.

[–] NGC2346@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It seems as though the elite is very motivated to win this battle. We will have to ditch every public platform, start self hosting and encrypt sensitive documents locally with PGP.

I hate the future so far.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

You describe a future with truer security guarantees, not a façade of trust and legal obscurities. A future where the consumer stands up to the bully by preventing their extortion, not by trusting the bully to fall in suit. That’s a future I can get behind, it sounds much less volatile. It sounds like consumers have some smidge of control for once.

Lest we forget, the platforms we build and use should prioritize security and transparency. It’s not like everyone will need to be an expert on protocols for secure peer to peer communication.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Sadly, you need to be very oblivious to what is going on for years to be surprised by this shit.