He just wants to sell chips to china is what I got from that article.
this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
30 points (91.7% liked)
Technology
4537 readers
520 users here now
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Post guidelines
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
What, do you expect him to settle for having a company that's only worth 5 trillion dollars?
Yeah, he’s desperate to have the US allow him to legally sell the high end GPUs directly to Chinese customers as opposed to the current system they use with lots of middlemen.
Despite funneling a huge chunk of the US GDP into it? Kinda feels like maybe AI is a scam, then.
Money doesn’t solve problems. Engineers solve problems. America is throwing too much money at hardware and not enough at people.
Let them? That way they're holding the bag when it implodes.
How do you "win" a tech / investment bubble? Is it a race to see whose economy implodes first?
You win by acknowledging that AI/Machine Learning research has existed long before this bubble existed, and is continuing to happen outside of that bubble. Most of what we call AI nowadays is based on neural networks (that's what Geoffrey Hinton and others got a recent nobel prize for), but that's not the only way to go about the problem, and for years now, there have been researchers pointing out problems like hallucinations and diminishing returns from increasing the amount of data you feed to a model.
An example of one such researcher is Song Chun-Zhu, who has recently moved back to China because he was finding it increasingly difficult to do research he wanted (i.e. outside of the current AI bubble) within the US. That linked article is a bit of a puff piece, in that it is a tad too mythologising of him, but I think he's a good example of what productive AI research looks like — especially because he used to work on the "big data" kind of AI, before realising its inherent limits and readjusting his approach accordingly.
He's one of the names that's on my watch list because even for people who aren't directly building on his research, he comes up a lot in research that is also burnt out on neural nets