this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2025
186 points (98.9% liked)

politics

26256 readers
3961 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Because he knows for a fact that GOP members will defect as soon as a simple majority is possible.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jaennaet@sopuli.xyz 149 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"[The filibuster] holds us back from the Democrats' worst impulses."

The Democrats' worst impulses like not hunting immigrants for sport?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They aren’t just hunting immigrants. It’s literally anyone they think they can take advantage of.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just like Dems have neoliberals who want to obstruct progressives and make money, Republicans have a significant amount of politicians who want to obstruct MAGA and just make money.

Both those subgroups need the filibuster as an excuse to not do what their voters want, because that isn't how they make the most money.

Without the fillibuster, republicans would have to do everything MAGA wants. Which would hasten damage ahead of midterms and make them more likely to lose.

Then when Dems get control, they'd have no excuse not to do the shit that works.

The filibuster is the only way the wealthy can keep the shell game going where nothing happens.

trumps just so stupid and never thinks long term, so he doesn't understand how important it is.

Like, that one dude did a performative speech starting after the Senate closed, but all it takes for a filibuster is someone saying:

Not me, but someone might filibuster this, so let's not do anything.

And that's enough to stop a vote.

This isn't democracy, it's a coordinated attempt at stopping progress

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Every single person participating in that farce needs to be held fully culpable of sabotaging our society for profit.

[–] Nyxias@fedia.io 22 points 1 day ago

It holds us back from the Democrats' worst impulses.”

Yours as well, especially, asshole. Because if the filibuster didn't exist, GOP would happily put any stupid idea they can on the express lane.

Also Mike Johnson is probably now on Trump's "People I don't like for disagreeing with me" list.

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Is Humpty Trumpty's wall crumbling?

[–] Tenthrow@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't hold your breath. The amount of shit this asshole has managed to get away with is BEYOND mindblowing.

[–] rayyy@piefed.social 1 points 17 hours ago

Give him a little more time for his "magic" to work. Looks like it will blossom in early spring.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are cracks in the unity of the MAGA movement, but I wouldn't say anything's crumbling yet.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, although it is inevitable that MAGA will fall eventually. Fascism always ends up destroying itself. The problem is it tends to take everyone else down with it.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Well, on that point. I don't see how Hoover could want more.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Don't worry, he'll feed them their pound of flesh with the systemic extermination of the LGBT population.

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We can all help by praising Mike Johnson for blocking Trump's wishes.

Would be a shame if we were to make a big deal out of that and Trump caught wind.

[–] Mist101@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I hear Mike Johnson has original thoughts that Trump doesn't even know about. SHHHH!!!

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is the shutdown caused by use of the fillabuster?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nope. And even if it was, the HOUSE speaker has no authority over SENATE rules and procedures.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The headline is really dumb. Why are they even asking him to begin with when there are a bunch of senators around to talk to?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

Probably either because all of the senators declined to comment or didn't say something they could twist into a man bites dog headline.