this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2025
115 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3453 readers
956 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes/pics of text

Post news related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lastunusedusername2@sh.itjust.works 51 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So we can finally tax the rich since they're not "job creators" anymore?

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 34 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's LITERALLY TERRORIST TALK (According to Republicans!)!

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 16 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] blueworld@piefed.world 31 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Powell also pushed back on the idea that all that spending is amounting to another speculative bubble. He drew a clear line between today’s surge in capital expenditure and the dot-com era, noting “these companies actually have earnings.” Those projects, he said, aren’t especially sensitive to interest rates, though, since they reflect long-term bets on higher productivity.

--

Remember, the industry is spending over $30 billion a month (approximately $400 billion for 2025) and only receiving a bit more than a billion a month back in revenue.

https://pracap.com/an-ai-addendum/

--

Despite $30–40 billion in enterprise investment into GenAI, this report uncovers a surprising result in that 95% of organizations are getting zero return.

MIT NANDA study – The GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025

--

So they are firing workers, spending their reserves on data centers that wear out and deprecate fast, on a product that is failing to deliver results and the C suite thinks that this is a way to generate value... Huh?

[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 4 days ago

When you put it like that... It seems bleak.

[–] femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It generates value for them and the shareholders in the short term. Unfortunately that always means we get screwed.

[–] The_Che_Banana@beehaw.org 7 points 4 days ago

The economy is based on the volume/speed of transactions, this is still propping up the economy.....until it doesn't.

and then, whoopsie, all the guys who shorted the economy gain (again) and the shit hits the fan all the 1% buy up the collateral damage, and you get cold ramen in your car, which is now your home.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

You've made a good effort at explaining why I think that the BBA and MBA are the only worthless degrees. They do nothing but spreadsheets, networking, and patting themselves on the back.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 24 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I doubt it really has much to do with AI. The economy is in the toilet right now due to tariffs and severe mismanagement. AI is being used as a scapegoat for layoffs and unemployment.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 4 days ago

yea its a scapegoat, to justify the lay offs. right now its being pedaled to retail so they end up with holding the bag, which will be problematic once it becomes AI USELESS, jobs will be loss in that sector.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

No, it's very much both things. AI is 100% taking jobs away from people. Wake up, everyone.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago

This reminds me of the worst of Janet Yellen. You're going down in history with Eugene Meyer and Herbert Hoover Jpow.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

even if this was true (it's not) wouldn't it behoove the federal government to regulate AI? like, maybe impose heavy taxes on companies that leverage AI and use that taxation to fund UBI?

nahhh, let's just trash the economy and obliterate the job markets.

[–] beella@lemmings.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You're almost there.

We shouldn't be taxing people for using AI. We should be taxing the wealthy because they only get wealthy by screwing everyone else over.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

tax the wealthy all you want, I agree.

but tax the companies that employ AI as well.

regulate AI.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago

That is FED Chair for “job creation is less than zero”

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 6 points 4 days ago

American decision process: Will this make corporations richer? If yes, go ahead.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago

My takeaway from all this is that John Maynard Keynes' concept of money velocity is correct, except this time it's companies of one industry whipping money and future promises of money back and forth to each other.