this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
92 points (98.9% liked)

Global News

5131 readers
227 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Democratic lawmaker revealed the shocking detail after a Pentagon briefing for members of Congress.

Archived version: https://archive.is/20251030220100/https://newrepublic.com/post/202502/pentagon-id-people-drug-boats


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 22 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah this was never about drugs. They're trying to start another war for oil.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago

I hate this simplified take, it gives people the wrong idea. They aren't trying to physically get Venezuela's oil, just like they weren't trying to physically get Iraq's oil. In fact, the US would be pleased as a pig in shit if not a single drop of oil ever left those countries. What they are trying to do is start another war to control the price of oil.

The US produces plenty of it's own oil and is a massive net exporter. They do not need any other country's oil, except for oil with different weights (which no one ever talks about, and the general public is barely aware of the differences). But when other countries start selling oil for cheap, the US doesn't like that because it weakens their place in the global market. THAT is the reason for these kinds of wars, the US wants to control the price of oil. Not necessarily the oil itself.

So while saying "it's a war for oil" is technically true, it lacks a lot of context and makes people who only look at surface level facts think the US is on some "I drink your milkshake" kind of crusade for finding oil, when it's really just about price control.

[–] bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago

The latest one was an American boat with American citizens

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 2 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Those boats don’t have drugs

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

At least some of them may have drugs. It doesn't matter though because even with illegal drugs aboard these boats are still not legitimate military targets. These attacks by the US military are inherently criminal.

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

But if they cannot prove after the fact that drugs were on board…

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

I'm not following. Whether or not drugs are onboard is irrelevant. Even if they can definitively prove drugs are onboard, it is still a crime for the US military to kill these people. This is categorically an illegitimate use of force. The only possible justification for this is if these boats were armed and posed an imminent threat, which obviously is not applicable.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Look, this is murder, plain and simple, and I don't trust a fucking thing this administration has to say about it, but the only boat I saw a clear video of was almost certainly running drugs.

4 monster engines on a small, roofless boat, nothing about it said "pleasure craft" or "fishing vessel", filled with square packages, running in the open Caribbean. None of that proves anything, of course, but what else could be going on?

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 1 points 13 hours ago

I understand what you’re saying, but being unable to come up with an idea of what people are doing doesn’t mean they’re doing anything bad. I have strange neighbors, and I have no idea what they are doing in their backyard… But that doesn’t mean they’re doing anything illegal.

Clearly the United States knew the location of the boats. So, tracking it to its destination would allow people to analyze the contents of the boat, and perhaps even identify the people they were trying to meet within the country. Additionally, they could question the people on the boat. That would be significantly more effective.

This administration is just blowing up people in the Caribbean without any justification. This kind of action suggests that I should be able to blow up anyone in international waters for whatever reason I want. If I see a cruise ship… Clearly a bunch of motherfuckers. Blow it up.