this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
112 points (90.6% liked)

politics

26226 readers
2578 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Plum@lemmy.world 183 points 1 day ago (54 children)

collapsed inline media

This. He said the good thing.. I don't like the click bait.

load more comments (54 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Platner, a Marine veteran and oyster farmer who launched his Democratic primary campaign in August in hopes of ultimately challenging Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) for her seat in 2026, answered that he firmly believes "that every single American has the right to live the life they want to live in their own body as they see fit," and emphasized what he views as his "responsibility" as a straight, white, cisgender male, to defend the rights of LGBTQ+ people.

"I get to put myself out there in ways that other people don’t," said Platner. "I'm doing this because I know that I can say things, I know that I can have conversations, I know that I can knock on doors in places that a lot of other people can't have access to, that a lot of other people won't feel safe in."

"Yes, I will absolutely stand next to you, and if we ever have to go knock doors together, I'm happy to stand by your side," he added.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Wow, people are really pulling the last bit out of context and assuming the worst implications. His "stand by you" and "knocking on doors" thing is him acknowledging his white male privilege to feel safe doing things like going door to door in most neighborhoods, and being happy to extend that safety to others by standing beside them while they do it.

I get the concern about having a Nazi tattoo for over a decade, and concern that everything he is doing is performative based on his past. But what he said was pretty unequivically that he will support LGBTQ+ people, including in action. Whether anyone believes him or not is up to them. But what he said was not mealy-mouthed, it was direct.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago

Shit, that’s a breath of fresh air!

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

This article is garbage.

His tattoo is not a resemblance to a nazi tattoo, it is a fucking nazi tattoo.

He knows it's a fucking Totenkopf and it is the size of a grapefruit right over his heart.

No self-respecting tattoo artist would put a Totenkopf on a human being without being a nazi themselves.

He got the Totenkopf in Croatia; a country with strong far-right ties.

He worked for Blackwater killing brown people in the Middle East.

He is not what he seems.

Good luck people of Maine.

[–] KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 19 hours ago (12 children)

Let's look at the relevant candidates for this Senate race:

It's Graham Platner -- a former marine who had a forgotten reddit account with years of pro-socialist posts; Janet Mills, a 77-year old dinosaur who will be anything but progressive; and sitting Republican Susan Collins.

People can change, and Platner has demonstrated that he did. Given his alternatives, is an old tattoo which he covered really any reason to not vote this guy??? It's not Graham Platner versus a picture-perfect socialist who runs a commune that saves orphans and puppies. It's Platner v. Susan Collins v. Janet Mills. Do not let the Mainstream Media make this a controversy.

[–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Purity testing has been the biggest contributor to the downfall of democracy.

If we weren't so ready to cut each other down trump wouldn't have gotten the foothold he did.

Until the progressive culture in America gets off its high horse the corporate donors are going to just keep us infighting while they sweep away our rights.

We need to accept that nobody is perfect and to allow anyone who wants to pull away from trump/conservativism to do so.

All this "once a X always a X" rhetoric only reinforces X identity because it denies any possible alternative.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Legonatic@lemmy.world 8 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

The purity test mentality so many of the commenters here have is the exact kind of nonsense that will keep the US divided politically. People are capable of making honest mistakes. People can change. There needs to be room for some gray areas. I generally think such a mindset reeks of being chronically online and being immersed into an echo chamber.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 3 points 42 minutes ago

I don’t know much about the candidate other than a few recent headlines but I admire the ability of a person to change their mind. This is especially true for someone in politics. Idk if he is a dickhead or if he really changed, but its good to own up to our mistakes.

A few years ago I remember seeing folks online who were ranting about Elizabeth Warren having been a republican so I looked it up. After watching her speak on the matter I sort of turned into a big Warren supporter, because she was able to admit she was wrong after seeming the data. That’s what I want in a representative. I don’t want someone who ignore data or twist it into something else.

I want someone who says “oh shit. Let’s fix this.”

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Eh, having read some of the reddit posts from the old account etc, if I were in that area voting, I'd likely give him the benefit of the doubt. Especially compared to alternatives. There were quite a few posts that seemed like he genuinely thought the symbols extended beyond 'just' Nazism, often arguing in his posts that it was common to see that sort of imagery on ppl in the military.

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

Let's be honest here. How many people would have recognized that image as a Nazi symbol before thos became news? I wouldn't have, skull tatoos are common. News articles had to tell is it was and show pictures of and explain what it had been some 80 years ago. Maybe he knew it was a Nazi symbol, but I kinda doubt it given his political statements and the fact that any smart person running for office in Maine wouldn't have got it removed long before.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›