this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
1122 points (98.5% liked)

politics

26213 readers
6577 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Independent Senator Bernie Sanders floated Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as a potential presidential candidate in the 2028 elections, saying that even though it's "her decision to make," she is a "very, very good politician."

Speaking to Axios, Sanders said that he has been "out on the streets with her" and noticed how she responds when people come up to her. "It's so incredibly genuine and open."

Ocasio-Cortez is seemingly positioning herself to run for higher office, whether it is challenging Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer for his seat or to make a run for president.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TomMasz@piefed.social 11 points 6 days ago

You have to admire his belief that there will actually be a 2028 presidential election.

[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I think that plenty of people who voted for Trump would be fine voting for a woman president as long as she's strongly advocating change

These people just know that things aren't great, they don't know whose fault it was or what policies caused it. So they vote for the person who says they'll change the most.

The largest deciding factor stated by people after voting was the economy. People remembered that there was a lot of inflation under Biden, and didn't want to keep similar policies. Of course, we know that Trump's first term had a pretty large influence on the state of the economy under Biden, and Biden's policies probably didn't hurt the economy. But the average voter is not that informed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (6 children)

The thing about AOC is that she can bring in the millennials which far out weigh the normal voting demographic.

Her first executive order should be to nullify all executive orders Donald Trump ever made.

Remove that man from history make everyone forget his name.

You know, kind of what happened with Caligula.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (39 children)

I really hate to say this, but there’s no way a woman will win in 2028 (if an election even happens).

The vast centrist vote will go towards stability and a return to the ‘values’ they think have been lost.

It sucks a lot, but the only viable choice will be a white man. I hate this, but it’s true.

Walz is probably the most politically viable choice. Does that suck? Yeah. But pragmatically, it’s just true.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The problem isn't their genitals. The problem is their policies.

Especially support for Israel.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)
[–] BannedVoice@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Adorable President with a solid political background and a good head on her shoulders?

YAS QUEEN!!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Strider@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

The last hope, so to say.

[–] thisphuckinguy@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Yeah she should run

[–] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

I don't think she has what it takes to come back from where you've gone. The next democratic president will have to match or exceed the current regime change policy and be able to ignore laws and norms and gerrymander to get enough power to do anything. Dems have nobody cutthroat enough to do these things.

[–] Nomorereddit@lemmy.today 9 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I'm going to lose all my karma. But the democrats don't need a pretty face.They need a freaking platform.

she really doesn't have a chance anyway.She's too polarizing. Clinton was same the same way.

We need to beat the republicans, not keep throwing them.Elections. also our identity politics are cringeworthy

[–] Malek061@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

AOC can win. No more milk toast centrists.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dgmib@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I hate that my thoughts on this need to waffle between:

(A) who do I think would be the best president, and

(B) who do I think has the most strategic chance of beating the GOP puppet candidate.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (8 children)

She’s a brilliant person, but the US has repeatedly shown it’s still too misogynistic to elect a woman president.

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

It might be the case. But look at the candidates we've had that are women. They're fucking awful. Hillary has politics that are probably to the right of Nixon, Jill Stein is clearly a Russian operative, and Kamala is a fucking disingenuous cop. So yeah, this country has a shit electorate, but the candidates have done nothing to show me that we absolutely wouldn't vote for a woman candidate.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›