How true. FOSS is a good example, but also the social sector.
this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
420 points (97.7% liked)
People Twitter
8476 readers
1576 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Transcript: "Under capitalism, people who care about people are a resource to be exploited by people who care about money." -- Mastodon toot by @katanova@retro.social from 18 September 2025.
Link to original toot: https://retro.social/@katanova/115223124269230247
Indeed, not things governed by capitalism
Oh, so you've read my resume?
Tipping for into this as well.
True and real.
Under capitalism if you got no capital, you are an expendable resource.
If you care about people outside of your immediate in group, you are in for a hard ride.
Grifting is the MO, protect yourself first. You can't fight the system until you achieve a degree of economic freedom to actually operate.
Political structure is completely captured.
Decentralized and asymmetric approach is the only option left but vast majority of the slave force are unwilling to do proper opposition.
I'm in this and I don't like it.
"Under capitalism" is such a weird phrase. At what point exactly, specifically, does one become not under capitalism?
I disagree that people aren't evil, though. However, I do also understand that evil isn't exactly tangible.
def. Liberals:
now if this person doesn't need violence to the face idk who does