this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
128 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

9310 readers
246 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Debian Trixie just released, and they dropped support for 32-bit x86. You can still run 32-bit software, but the OS must be running on amd64 (aka x86_64). Given the amount of distros which are Debian derivatives, there's probably not going to be a whole lot of systems around to run 32-bit Firefox on anyway.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 19 points 1 day ago

It's a bit like a henn-egg problem: Debian does no longer support i386 as many projects have dropped their support. Projects drop their support, because there are only few systems with that architecture still in use...

From trixie, i386 is no longer supported as a regular architecture: there is no official kernel and no Debian installer for i386 systems. Fewer packages are available for i386 because many projects no longer support it. The architecture’s sole remaining purpose is to support running legacy code, for example, by way of multiarch or a chroot on a 64-bit (amd64) system.

https://www.debian.org/releases/trixie/release-notes/issues.en.html#reduced-support-for-i386

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The i386 branch still exists, they dropped the installer.

You can upgrade a Debian 12 i386 system just fine to Debian 13

[–] noahimesaka1873@lemmy.funami.tech 11 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

They did explicitly said that it's completely unsupported scenario. It's only for multiarch usage so even kernel isn't provided.

Users running i386 systems should not upgrade to trixie.

From https://www.debian.org/releases/trixie/release-notes/issues.en.html#reduced-support-for-i386

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago

That depends on the specific CPU model used:

The i386 architecture is now only intended to be used on a 64-bit (amd64) CPU. Its instruction set requirements include SSE2 support, so it will not run successfully on most of the 32-bit CPU types that were supported by Debian 12.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Does that mean a smaller binary somehow? Less code? Eventually maybe?

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It could mean faster development if they can spend that time on other things

[–] RogueBanana@piefed.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago

I mean some of them have been good. I actually really like the offline translation, for example. No more sending data to Google Translate servers is a genuine privacy win.

There's also been some better screen reader support integrated because of it, and my sister loves it, she just wants it to be expanded further.

Yes, there's also the LLM integration, which I'm... less enthused by, to say the least.

But at least it's optional and can be tied into local models if you wish. Plus there's the factor of new normie users testing out Firefox and going "it doesn't have a gpt bot? Pfft I'm going back to Chrome, Firefox is so far behind" to contend with. If the market decides it wants that feature, then Mozilla can't really ignore it.

[–] magic_lobster_party@fedia.io 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It just means they won’t test 32 bit versions for bugs. The impact on binary size will be non-negligible.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago

So... the impact will be gligible?

[–] morto@piefed.social 13 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Running 32-bit firefox is the only viable way to use my mini laptop that has only 2gb of ram :(

[–] Sina@beehaw.org 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

2gb ram with a window manager is enough for 4-5 tabs, however if it has a single core 32 bit cpu the modern internet is borderline unusable already. The memory capacity is a non issue in that case.

[–] morto@piefed.social 3 points 12 hours ago

It's a 64-bit cpu. From personal experience, using 32 bit firefox, I can run a bit more tabs. It's enough for my use case, which is editing text documents and doing a bit of online research while in bed. I use it as an auxiliary device and sync my files using syncthing.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I'm looking for my old Nokia phone so I can throw it at you.

[–] morto@piefed.social 5 points 11 hours ago

An old nokia!? Such scale of firepower is considered a war crime!

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

... and probably only has a 32-bit Intel Atom processor.

[–] morto@piefed.social 4 points 12 hours ago

It's a bay trail series, it's 64-bit. I'm running mx linux and only installed the 32-bit firefox using multiarch, because the difference is pretty noticeable

[–] entwine@programming.dev -2 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

If ever there was a justified case for sending a machine to the landfill, this one seems like a good candidate.

Why would you even want to use such a terrible machine? Is it nostalgia, ideals, masochism, a weird fetish, or something else? It definitely isn't money, as you can find something much better by going dumpster diving.

[–] morto@piefed.social 9 points 11 hours ago

Whoa, take a deep breath, relax a bit. Modern life can get us constantly on our nerves, I understand it, but let's not take it out on each other.

About the machine, it's a very comfortable one to do writing work, and still works fine, so why not use it? Also, I'm from a "global south" country, and I can't afford to replace stuff when I still have something in working conditions. Dumpsters around here don't contain working electronic devices, by the way.

I didn't comment like complaining in a demanding way, like thinking that mozilla devs would have to maintain it for me. I just commented to express myself and show that there are real people still using 32-bit software around the world

[–] Hexarei@beehaw.org 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I mean. "It's fun and still works for what I use it for" seems like a fine reason to me, just saying.

[–] entwine@programming.dev 0 points 17 hours ago

It depends. Spend enough time on bug trackers and forums for open source software, and you're bound to encounter hostile assholes shitting on devs when they make decisions to drop support for ancient hardware like the OP. It's particularly egregious IMO because they usually are willing and happy to use an ancient build of some proprietary software without complaining, but feel entitled to demand more from open source maintainers for some reason.

If you're doing it for your own fun, not making demands of devs/maintainers, and accepting that you're not going to get support for a lot of software, then it's all good.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It's pretty obvious they like the form factor, otherwise "mini laptop" would not have been mentioned explicitly.

...and I get it. I used to have an old Compaq Evo N200 ultraportable which was about the size of an iPad. It was awesome. Way too slow for modern web use, though.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah cause it's not like there's a thousand tablets out there that you can pick up that are the exact same form factor.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Some people like their screen and keyboard being attached to each other.