this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2025
12 points (92.9% liked)

World News

49802 readers
2708 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Throughout the unprecedented bombing campaign that has defined Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza, Palestinians there have lived with a near constant, inescapable sound of drones.

It’s a sound that signals death could be close.

Hind Hassan tracks how the Israeli military has dramatically increased its use of drones and artificial intelligence (AI) to surveil, track and kill Palestinians.

In Gaza, this technology has produced a kill rate higher than any other 21st-century conflict. But its implications are far greater – creating the potential for armies of the future to inflict maximum destruction on their targets with minimal risk to themselves.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

I know this sub doesn't like to watch news for some reason... But reality doesn't always cater to the rules of comms...

[–] Paragone@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

There is a fallacy underlying the quoted-meaning, & an error..

Ukraine's war is now drone-dominated, ttbomk ( I'm including land, sea, & air drones ), so the genociding of Palestinians isn't the only drone-dominated war happening, ttbomk..

The fallacy, though, is that the wielder-of-the-weapons not being in the battlefield, somehow means that the country, or people of the wielders are not at risk:

The enemy can bomb one while one is wielding drones, why not?

The enemy can wield their-own drones against one, while one is wielding drones against them, why not?

Just because one isn't at "the front" doesn't mean that one is safe, when both sides are wielding drones.

Yes it does de-couple risk from fighting, for any aggressor, but de-coupling it doesn't mean that opponent striking one somehow ceases to happen, it just converts it more into a tech-heavy cat-&-mouse game..

_ /\ _