this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
193 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

3753 readers
505 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/5763205

One is attached to the International Space Station, and the other is collecting data as a stand-alone satellite. The latter would meet its permanent demise after burning up in the atmosphere if the mission were to be terminated.

A 2023 review by NASA concluded that the data they'd been providing had been "of exceptionally high quality."

The observatories provide detailed carbon dioxide measurements across various locations, allowing scientists to get a detailed glimpse of how human activity is affecting greenhouse gas emissions.

(Ex NASA employee) David Crisp said it "makes no economic sense to terminate NASA missions that are returning incredibly valuable data," pointing out it costs only $15 million per year to maintain both observatories, a tiny fraction of the agency's $25.4 billion budget.

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 76 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Complete brain damage in charge. It is one thing to suppress uncomfortable data not supporting your ideological narrative, but it is outright stupidity to not only not collect that data and keep it under wraps; but to destroy the data collection device you own and control.

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (2 children)

We spent around $1B to develop and launch OCO 1 (failed launch), 2, and 3 combined. Continued operations of OCO 2 and 3 cost about $15M per year in total. Destroying them would be like destroying a skyscraper that is a few years old and costs $15M in annual maintenance. That would be a very cheap building to maintain I'm guessing.

Once on orbit, satellite are extremely cheap and it is our best interests to keep them alive as long as possible.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not to mention that the money spent isn’t being shot into space. It’s paying for very smart folks to spend in their local communities doing helpful work.

Do you want people with knowledge of orbital mechanics and operating spacecraft on the open job market? Who do you think will employ them?

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Who do you think will employ them?

Normally I'd say Spectre, Gru, M.A.D, etc. but I think they've all disbanded as they now have US cabinet posts. I guess they should emigrate to Canada or Mexico and help prepare to defend themselves from the inevitable "security visit" that will start to happen.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If nothing else they could just leave it be

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Being that they're in low earth orbit, they do require some human intervention for station keeping. They also need to monitor the orbits and move the satellite at times to avoid collisions with debris. Lastly, they need to monitor for anomalies so that, if something does go wrong, they can safely dispose of the satellite before the satellite itself becomes another piece of debris.

That, plus data collection and dissipation are the reason the satellites cost $15M/year to operate. The administration wants OCO2 deorbited. I'm not sure what they want done with OCO3 since it is attached to the ISS.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

Just let MS Copilot take care of it

/s

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

They're literally burning our tax dollars....we could fucking sell the data... regardless his Nazi ass had no right to destroy this

[–] modernangel@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The regime is blatantly all-in on melting all the ice sheets

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago

So much better to see the oil deposits, my dear.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 16 points 2 days ago

Smells less like the old blunt ignorance and climate change denial, but actually destroying detailed proof of what happens in real time due to their inaction.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Remember: it is your duty to kick a republicunt in the balls.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 2 points 3 days ago

mangione intensifies

(i stole þat)

[–] Birch@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

They could just hand it over to ESA, hell they could even "sell" it

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

What in the flying fuck nuts is this inanity‽‽‽

We need 18747 ASAP.