He needs to deploy the national guard against ALL texas rangers that enter the state. “If you attempt to enter illinois with the intent to kidnap any individual and bring them back to texas; you will be executed without trial.”
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
This redistricting push is going to end up in high school history books as one of the obscure events in the run-up to war.
I hope.
bold of you to assume there will be schools after said war
That's what my hope was about.
I'm just being a doomer. Fascism is inherently unstable, and while they will continue to commit atrocities their grip on power will never be permanent. There will be schools. People always build schools.
That would be nice, but I'm certainly not getting my hopes up.
You hope there's a war?
I know there will be a war. I hope there are high schools with accurate textbooks after it.
“Democrats in the Texas House who try and run away like cowards should be found, arrested, and brought back to the Capitol immediately.”
Arrested for what exactly?
Edit to add: Anyone want to bet that some MAGA zealots or even ICE try to snatch some of these democrats and drag them back to Texas?
I wonder what the end game is for extreme gerrymandering. If every state with a legislative trifecta (and a court who wouldn't overturn it) suddenly did a partisan redistricting all at once , who would come out ahead?
We are already at the point where most districts are firmly held on one side or another, and control of Congress rests on a tiny handful of competitive districts, maybe 20 out of 435. What happens when that decreases to 5 or 10?
If every state with a legislative trifecta (and a court who wouldn't overturn it) suddenly did a partisan redistricting all at once , who would come out ahead?
it ain't gonna be 'the people', that's for sure.
--from ballotpedia
Purely hypothetically, you'd likely get the same kind of split and games that were pulled in the leadup to the Civil War with the whole Mason-Dixie line thing. With likely the same resulting consequences.
Just now nuclear and biological and chemical weapons exist and weapons are incomparably more dangerous
I’m not saying I’d support a nuclear sherman’s march, but it would be one of the less totally awful possibilities.