this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2025
155 points (95.9% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

7279 readers
1378 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump: *shoots America with tariffs*

MAGA: why didn't the liberal minority in Congress stop this?

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I understand that this is sarcasm.

But you just watched Democrats hand over their best leverage by opting not to shut down Donald's government and voting with Republicans, so, they're not entirely wrong. We don't have legitimate opposition. We have a minority party performatively putting up a false pretense at opposition, sitting back, and watching their stock portfolios soar.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

by opting not to shut down Donald’s government and voting with Republicans

What are you talking about? Are you talking about a specific bill? Which one? All Dems voted against the 'huge hideous bill' (budget bill). Dems don't have the power/votes to 'shut down Donald's government'.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Pay attention.

Can't pass a regressive tax bill if the government shuts down.

Democrats aren't powerless. They're complicit. The BBB was only possible because they made it possible.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Ok. You said "But you just watched", so I thought you were talking about the most recent catastrophic legislation, which is why I asked which bill you were talking about. Schumer's a cowardly piece of shit and could have used the only chance dems had or will have, because the other cowardly pieces of shit would have followed his lead and voted against it if he would have.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

I also referenced a shutting down of the government, which to me, seems pretty clear.

[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago

"I keep punching myself in the face! Why is Joe biden not stopping me!?"

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Link to the replies to the removed comment:

https://web.archive.org/web/20250713072842/https://old.reddit.com/r/Conservative/comments/1ly12mh/trump_announces_30_tariffs_on_mexico_eu_starting/n2qg7u1/?context=3


The user in question tries to educate another user.

collapsed inline media

Transcript:

Post Title: Trump announces 30% tariffs on Mexico, EU starting August 1st

Comments:

agk927 Moderate Conservative -189 points 17 hours ago

It'll make us some money. I see no issue here

akbuilderthrowaway Heinlein 415 points 16 hours ago

... you do realize Americans pay the tax, right? This is a consumption tax on American for foreign goods. Other nations are not paying this tax. You are. This is a tax on Americans.

agk927 Moderate Conservative -280 points 16 hours ago

He wouldn't do it if it hurt us. Keep listening to the misinformation. There's 2 sides to every story

akbuilderthrowaway Heinlein 321 points 16 hours ago

Misinformation? Dude. Seriously. Open your fucking eyes. Importers aren't going to eat 25+% taxes out of the goodness of their hearts. It's going to get passed on to consumers.

I can call a spade a spade. Trump's tariff policy is awful. You can't, on one hand, spout out rhetoric about lowering taxes and then pull shit like this.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 day ago

He wouldn’t do it if it hurt us

lol

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 13 points 1 day ago

Self aware wolf

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i work for an importer. My family are all college educated. I still have to explain this to people who have business degrees who should know better. The single most important thing I do at work is make sure the taxes and tariffs are paid before the shipping container gets released from the ship.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is there any substantial decline in the imports in the last 6 months?

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

not the same person but i work in TLSC - variously, yes, in general people are doing feast and famine to import when tariffs get paused, and don't when they're not

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Is it possible that the will they won't they tariff policy is actually increasing imports, since companies now have to hold more inventory to cover for it?

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 3 points 19 hours ago

Depends, but generally what people do is "nearshoring" or "friendshoring" where they send things through a different country that has lower rates - i.e. if you can ship it directly from India but it costs too much on tarrifs, ship it from India to Mexico and drive it over the border to get a lower rate.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago

Not in the wine importing business I work at. We are seeing across the board reductions and changes in drinking habits

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago

Yea, I work in booze importing so we have been hit hard as many are giving up drinking (not criticizing that choice only stating a fact) and many others can no longer afford alcohol regularly.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 27 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

So sick of conservatives breaking shit like children and then demanding liberals clean it up.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

So sick of conservatives breaking shit like children and then demanding liberals clean it up.

So sick of the stupids breaking shit like children and then demanding normal people clean it up.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 1 points 6 minutes ago

Ok there Obama anger translator. lol

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 15 points 21 hours ago

Pretty sure he's doing tariffs specifically because they aren't a tax. They aren't collected by the IRS, they're collected by Customs and Border Protection, which is a division of the Dept. of Homeland Security (just like ICE). And because the head of the DHS is such a loyal stooge, whatever god-king shitstain says goes

[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

The convoluted hill these morons made for themselves has actually been really satisfying. I hate these people and it’s good to know that it’s nothing but a total fucking mess inside their dumb little heads

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even the MAGAs are frustrated with democrats doing NOTHING. Even they know this is bullshit!

[–] Benedict_Espinosa@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

What could they realistically do, when Trump controls all branches of government from Congress to the Supreme Court? It can be argued that they should have shut down his government in March, when they had the chance to reject the spending bill - but what can they do now?

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago

What could they realistically do

How many times have they filibustered actual legislation or appointees since trump took office?

[–] msfroh@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 58 minutes ago)

Ooh! There was an episode of the Past, Present, Future podcast a couple of months ago that touched on this very subject. Tariff policy was set by congress up until the Smoot-Hawley act, which was considered such garbage that they decided that it should be left to the executive.

Back when it was a congressional power, it was also the source of some of the worst horse-trading, as representatives from rural areas would seek protection on agricultural imports (with low tariffs on imported machinery), while representatives from manufacturing areas would seek to lower food prices and increase the cost of imported manufactured goods.

Edit: Not saying that handing it to the executive is the best plan, as we can see by what's going on now, but letting congress do it was also problematic. It's funny how a lot of us grew up with the idea that no/low tariffs are the natural order, when it's actually been a fairly short-lived anomaly in historical terms.