this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
386 points (94.7% liked)

politics

24588 readers
2678 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Welp...

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ApeNo1@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

The Country Under Not Trump party

[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

The Let That Sink In party?

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 6 points 18 hours ago

Perfect timing. Just when everyone hates musk he wants votes.

Yea, that gonna be fun to cringewatch

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Good time to make a fourth party.

Ross Perot 2.0

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 5 points 1 day ago

Ketamin kicked in and he thinks people like him again.

He's toxic now. Giving money to candidates will have the opposite effect.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Maybe when this fizzles out we can get bipartisan support to change our First Past the Post voting system.

This will ultimately fail until that changes.

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

Their logo needs to be a muskrat. Doesn't matter what they name it.

[–] merdaverse@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

At least give it a cool name like The (John) Galt Party or something so it has a better change of splitting the right. I guess the nazi party was already taken?

[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

he's just so bad with names. Surprised he didn't call it the X Party. wouldn't that have been more "cool"? surprised he didn't ask Grok to come up with party names, I mean hell I use chatgpt to come up with names for videogame characters and it works well.

This is going to fizzle out when he inevitably gets distracted by something else.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)

oh no, he used going to spilt the nazi vote

Opportunity for a 4-way split? Sanders and AOC can make a new party called “Freedom Party” so we can have something other than the establishments.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

What's it called again ? Please let it be an AnCap one, it would make sense for him to do just that

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›