this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
481 points (94.8% liked)

Memes

11133 readers
792 users here now

Post memes here.

A meme is an idea, behavior, or style that spreads by means of imitation from person to person within a culture and often carries symbolic meaning representing a particular phenomenon or theme.

An Internet meme or meme, is a cultural item that is spread via the Internet, often through social media platforms. The name is by the concept of memes proposed by Richard Dawkins in 1972. Internet memes can take various forms, such as images, videos, GIFs, and various other viral sensations.


Laittakaa meemejä tänne.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 78 points 2 days ago (5 children)

IIRC, Spotify watches the system volume and doesn’t pay for streams playing when it’s muted. Physically unplugging your speakers should work, though.

[–] Alk@sh.itjust.works 45 points 2 days ago (4 children)

If you have a desktop and not a laptop, it's always a great idea to get a separate sound controller. Either a dac/amp for nice headphones, volume controls on a wireless headset, or even buy a sound mixer like the rodecaster duo so you can assign independent applications to each physical slider on the mixer. I do that last one and it's such a quality of life improvement if you use your PC a lot.

All of these options can't be seen from Spotify.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't think a site can view your system volume. They can however see if a tab is specifically muted https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/WebExtensions/API/tabs/MutedInfo

[–] Alk@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think the Spotify application may be able to, I assume this is what OP was talking about.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I was not expecting that mixer to be nearly $1,000 lol

[–] Alk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Yeah that one is pricey, but you can certainly get cheap ones for a fraction of the price. Most people don't need the one I have, and smaller ones can serve the same purpose.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Interesting, I actually just adjust the volume knob on my desktop speakers so I didn't think of this when I wrote the meme.

But now I kinda wanna see if I can hijack this monitoring it does and fake 100% volume to the application at all times...hmm welp to the mile long project list it goes!

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Cut the jack off a crappy earbuds, then stick the unconnected jack into your headphone port

https://www.midilifestyle.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/IMG_0008.jpg

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

I was on a team testing multimedia for a while and this was the solution for the big lab full of desktops and laptops running automated tests.

[–] Kualdir@feddit.nl 4 points 2 days ago

I think if you just use voicemeeter and set it to a monitor as output that should work

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gravitywell@sh.itjust.works 68 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Why not just stop using spotify? You cant possibly stream enough to cost them more then they earn in a month from you using it. Even on mute they can still count you as an active user when it comes to selling ads and promiting themselves.

If you really want to hurt spotify, use one of the services like Soundiiz that lets you export your lists and library, grab a 2 month trial of tidal for $2 and point tidal-dl to download it all for offline use. Get yourself a nice dedicated music player like a classic ipod running rockbox. If space is an issue convert from flac to opus.

If you really, really, want to hurt spotify do what i did and take the above instructions and then also spin up your own FunkWhale pod so everyone can also enjoy that music without giving corporations like spotify a dime.

We arent going beat corporations by using their products "too much", the way to beat them is to replace them with self hosted alternatives.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

It's not about using or not using Spotify. It's about getting the artists more money.

[–] gravitywell@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well if thats your goal buy their music or merch, or just send them cash directly, most artists are on bandcamp, smaller artists will at least have a venmo or cashapp you can send to.

Artists arent making their rent money on whatever pittance spotify pays them, you would do more good for the actual artist if you just promoted their work and gave them a few bucks directly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Greddan@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tidal is pretty good for that. Better app than Spotify and better quality too!

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll look into tidal. I've never used it before.

[–] toomanypancakes@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm a big fan of Tidal from my usage thus far, they pay their artists something like 1.3 cents a stream versus 0.3 cents (numbers pulled from my memory and may be slightly off). Plus, the higher audio quality available and the 6 person family plan are nice to have.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Getting the artists more money is ALL about not using Spotify.

[–] trashboat@midwest.social 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is there a good FOSS service for discovering new music based on taste? I hate a lot of the closed-source algorithm BS that corpo apps force users into, but Spotify winds up doing a fair job at finding deep cuts that I enjoy

[–] gravitywell@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

There's lots of good music communities to follow on lemmy: https://beehaw.org/post/516009

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

You mean something like Last.fm and Listenbrainz.org ?

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can they shut down your funkwhale for sharing?

[–] gravitywell@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

In theory funkwhale can be private, but no one is going to bother you for having a public one. Mine has been running for 2 years without any takedown requests.

If enough people started using funkwhale to the point it actually affected spotifys revenue they might start to care, but as much as i would like for that to happen, i dont think its very likely.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

They stopped paying out for that after Sleepify in 2014.

[–] LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

That was Vulfpeck, wasn't it? I ought to get back into them.

[–] Manticore@lemmy.nz 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

AFAIK this fucks with artists, not Spotify.

Spotify doesn't pay artists a flat amount per stream. Instead, Spotify's profits are split between artists based on their streams. A single user heavily streaming is imperceptibly lowering 'revenue per stream' by increasing overall streams but only paying for one subscription.

By playing a bunch of songs, all you do is give those artists slightly more, and other artists slightly less – at least in theory. In practice you're probably not steaming enough to change overall percentages.

So if anything, you are moving profit to support the artists that Spotify is promoting by putting in your 'radio'. Which likely means instead of going to small undiscovered musicians, it goes towards popular established ones that Spotify assumes you'll like.

But since this is probably not enough to move those percentages, you're only messing up your own algorithm.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Why even use Spotify at all? Isn't it like the worst option in terms of actually paying creators? Even YouTube Music is much better option imho, although the app is unresponsive and a UX nightmare.

[–] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think one of the allures of Spotify is a good algorithm which often recommends niche and small artists according to your taste

[–] urandom@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Really. For a long time it’s kept giving me songs which I’ve heard a thousand times. I can’t seem to find anything new

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Youtube is owned by google, who suck dick and are taking an active role in devolving democracy.

Spotify just sucks dick. Also support EU...everyone should move to deezer maybe.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 13 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Jokes on you. They just dilute the royalty payment among all the artists you've streamed, so Spotify's cut isn't really bring affected.

Fun right?

[–] orb360@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Worse, they start injecting AI generated songs when you're not paying attention and can keep more of the royalties for themselves

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

IIRC this is already happening, some people are reporting getting AI music in their auto playlists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lightfire228@pawb.social 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I use Tidal instead of Spoofie

Same price, higher quality audio, and imo a better recommendation feed

[–] Raab@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I use tidal as well, just wish there was mobile/desktop sync

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Excess ain't rebellion.
You're drinking what they're selling.
Your self-destruction doesn't hurt them.
Your chaos won't convert them.
They're so happy to rebuild it.
You'll never really kill it.
Yeah, excess ain't rebellion.
You're drinking what they're selling.
Excess ain't rebellion.
You're drinking,
You're drinking,
You're drinking what they're selling.

Rock and Roll Lifestyle

Spotify loves you for this. And the artists can't perceive it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's an e-commerce platform.

/s

[–] bricked@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago

I always do this accidentally when my earphones' battery runs out

[–] HailSeitan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Revenue is distributed proportionally as a percentage of revenue based on streams relative to other artists, not per stream

[–] Zamboni_Driver@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

So you pay Spotify money each month. Do you really think that they are paying artists more than you pay them? Doubt it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] miridius@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

PSA: there is a revanced patch to remove ads from spotify

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who... who are the corpos paying to?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stinky@redlemmy.com 4 points 1 day ago

...doesn't that just give them free advertising credits?

[–] the_abecedarian@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

I tried. Endured 10 minutes of a long intro and a lady selling her book saying "um like" every other two words...

I have no info to share.

[–] Kualdir@feddit.nl 19 points 2 days ago

That's an hour long video without a timestamp bro ;-;

[–] Doom@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I just run it on the TV through my Xbox for the cats

load more comments (2 replies)

I really thought it said "nutting" instead of "muting". I was so confused and the photo of Hank Hill did not help with that confusion.

load more comments
view more: next ›