this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2025
1455 points (98.4% liked)

Political Memes

8618 readers
2328 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] x4740N@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I remember seeing some post of reddit while lurking of a bunch of election letters being dumped in a drain

I wonder what came of that

Edit: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mTLoKMyLnDI

[–] copd@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

You think "nobody" is talking about it?

What a tiny world you live in

[–] Donkter@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Yeah, man, let's get back to talking about it. Like we were doing. Just sittin around, talking about it, while more and more of this list happened. And then we just kept on talkin. That's what we need to get back to, suddenly, no one's talking about it. That's the problem.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 6 points 2 days ago

Joffrey has really upped his game this season.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A pastor? Never heared of "Thou shalt not kill"?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WiseScorpio@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

We are used having a crisis per quarter not crazy Orange Chicken spamming the controls and creating 4 crises per day

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I thought the 2024 election rigging was all wild speculation?

I agree the pieces are there for it to happen but I didn't see any actual evidence.

[–] limelight79@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I saw an analysis of results in deep-blue Arizona cities where there were quite a few people who voted for Trump...then Democrat down the rest of the ballot.

It's not hard evidence, but it's suspicious. The problem the US has is that the winners are quite okay with winning at any cost and don't see a problem, even if the win was stolen.

load more comments (1 replies)

There's an active court case in New York uncovering indications of tampering and wild statistical anomalies. This blog is a little conspiratorial sounding, but it's also doing a difficult job of putting back together the pieces of what is looking like a well executed technological coup.

https://thiswillhold.substack.com/p/she-won-they-didnt-just-change-the

[–] deaf_fish@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes and no. As others have stated, there isn't a whole lot of evidence that any specific cheating was happening. But historically Republicans have always cheated and if there was a way to cheat they would cheat. They have been slowly putting people into positions that would allow them to affect the elections. They have been making laws to make it harder for people to vote that they don't want voting.

I think the more interesting question is if they did cheat, would it even matter?

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It would change the narrative but it's not like they would follow the courts of they said it was stolen and had to be redone or something

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

Another descriptive term is wagging the dog (referring to the tail having disproportionate leverage over the beast) which is a (not uncommon) presidential tactic of taking a serious military action in order to distract from other scandals.

News media, including classic liberal media will allow other stories to die to report on attacks or invasions (or when you can get it, attacks on the US by foreign units).

George W.Bush used this method, but also blitzing the public with countless scandals. (George H. W. Bush did too) So Trump's kitchen cabinet was likely informed by history when considering becoming Bibi's personal B.

[–] dis_honestfamiliar@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I am so drunk rn but I can't wait to read this tomorrow because you are a goddess sharing fucking .gov sources to a mother fucking bill and I'm ALL ABOUT those kind of sources after years of clickbait news

we the people have probably read more of any given proposed bill than the republican congress voting on it, how fucked is that?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Pretty much all I ever talk about, and its also all over the news, idk where you're taking shelter under.

Always appreciate more attention on it, tho, good work.

Oh yes we are. The news has a short memory but we don't. F that guy.

[–] curiousPJ@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

No a real act or terror is burning empty cybertrucks.

/s

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It does feel like that story just got moved from way too fast.

[–] remon@ani.social 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Well, Americans shooting each other is hardly news.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 3 points 2 days ago

it is when the republicans skim their knee

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

It's almost to that point with republican domestic terrorists. Hell, they admitted as much at cpac

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

The news around Donald changes faster than the weather in the mid-west. He's done more or been involved in more in a few months than most presidents could accomplish in 2 full terms.

Throwing a brick into a dryer is less chaotic.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›