this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
198 points (99.0% liked)

World News

47538 readers
2938 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Naich@lemmings.world 52 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

So either racism has gone away or FIFA is A-OK with it now.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 37 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

now

They've always been OK with it, now it's just mask off.

[–] S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 hours ago

Theh never gsve a fucj unless people complained and sometimes even then

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago

How are they supposed to play soccer when FIFA has no balls?

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 21 points 10 hours ago
[–] vane@lemmy.world 18 points 4 hours ago
[–] Decq@lemmy.world 17 points 9 hours ago

Ah yes FIFA. Happy to talk about inclusivity while it's good for pr and ad revenue. But as soon as it inconveniences their corrupt buddies suddenly it will get you a fine or ban. Can an organization be more blatantly corrupt? Maybe the IOC?

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I mean FIFA kinda thrives on, if not racism, nationalism. I mean sports in general tend to gear thinking in that way. Not always to a problematic level but anyone with family or friends who super into sports knows what I'm saying here

[–] Zarmeck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

Us vs them mentality

[–] BenjiRenji@feddit.org 10 points 8 hours ago

Obviously it's for the US where everything "DEI" is evil. They're just adapting to the WC guest country.

[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago

FIFA sucks and always has

[–] klu9@piefed.social 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

From "No racism" to "No "no racism"": America's great again!!!

[–] Airowird@lemm.ee 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Please, learn from Lionel Hutz, it's supposed to be "No, racism!"

[–] hsr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

Maybe they're speaking Polish. "No to rasizm" translates to "Well, racism it is!"

[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 5 points 9 hours ago

This reminded me that this clip exists.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 4 points 4 hours ago

Flashback: Once upon the time, 2014, the DFB (German football association) required the FC St. Pauli to "neutralise" their grounds as they were having the national team as guests for training before their friendly against Poland. As far as the club understood the thing, that meant obscuring all the sponsor ads, fair enough. The DFB interpreted it differently: Also any and all political slogans shall be obscured, and St. Pauli, famously, sports a big "Kein Fußball den Faschisten" in the stadium, installed permanently. ("No football for fascists" -- as in they're not supposed to have any at all, not this football isn't for them). The DFB then improvised and, with limited means, covered the slogan to read "no football". It was a draw, nil nil. Uninspired, one might say.

[–] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

For comparison: Brazil had to suspend its law that forbids alcohol on stadiums for the 2014 World Cup.

[–] jjpamsterdam@feddit.org 4 points 5 hours ago

As it turns out, it really didn't have to. Brazil simply respected agreements instead of unilaterally reneging on them at short notice. If the World Cup ever comes to Brazil again, I'd recommend pulling a Qatar and just nodding along until two weeks before the tournament starts and then just changing the rules according to what you believe is correct.