this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025

190 points (98.5% liked)

World News

47606 readers

2459 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

NewsAutoMod@lemmy.world

jordanlund@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

lemmyAtom@lemmy.world

190

Suspect Vance Boelter in Minnesota lawmakers shooting arrested by police: Sources - ABC News (abcnews.go.com)

submitted 3 days ago by slothrop@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 31 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[+] ToadOfHypnosis@lemm.ee 77 points 3 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] jimjam5@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Ya, we have the right of free speech, but hate-filled and verifiably false speech/statements should be punished or at least labeled with mandatory warnings that indicate them as such.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The problem with that kind of thing is always "who decides what's hate-filled and false?" If there was a Federal government mechanism for that in the United States it would now be in the hands of Trump and the Republicans.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You're both right which is the real conundrum. It's becoming increasingly obvious that conspiracy theories and propaganda in our hyperconnected social media fueled internet are incredibly dangerous and rot the foundations of democracy. Democracy can not survive if these kinds of things are left unchecked. By the same token however any mechanism that immediately springs to mind to combat them is ripe for abuse and easily subverted by fascists and totalitarians. I honestly don't know what the solution is, only that we desperately need one.

[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

America is a polarized country, and the two general world views would probably strongly disagree on what constitutes "hate speech". And you cannot just handwave the issue because there is no clear dominant group. Elections are won and lost on relatively razor thin margins, splitting political power between two very disparate groups. Unless you're willing to literally fight a war over it, you might find yourself on the wrong side of the definition and thus subject to state application of force.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

TL;DR: of that whole thing boils down to "the problem is too hard to solve and all the solutions are worse than the problem so don't even try". I don't agree with the premise because if we accept it, then democracy is doomed.

We can not have a functioning society when we can't even get a majority of the citizens to agree on basic aspects of reality and half the people are convinced the other half are lizard people that are putting mind control drugs in the water supply. A functioning democracy requires an informed and educated populace, and unchecked propaganda, disinformation, and conspiracy theories lead to the opposite of that, particularly when you have a wealthy group that profits from spreading it.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Technology advances quickly and lawmaking advances slowly. 50 years ago, this wouldn't have been nearly as much of a problem, because the flow of information would be a lot slower, and fewer people would be exposed to these things. Today, Trump posts something hate-filled on the internet and his followers everywhere in the country see it immediately. Same goes for any other person with social media influence. If Elon Musk posts something provably false, tens of millions of people consume it. A hundred people can post the proof that it's false within minutes, and a fraction of those people will see it and even fewer will care.

The problem isn't the speech, the problem is the platform they're given.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

The platform is a tool, and like most tools it can be used for both good and evil. I agree it's making the problem significantly worse, but hyper focusing on just the platforms while ignoring the people using them doesn't seem like the right approach either. I don't know how to preserve the positive aspects of platforms like Facebook, TikTok, and Youtube while also preventing them from being abused to spread hate and lies. I feel like there must be something that can be done to at least improve the situation a little. The various "community notes" features I don't think were a terrible first step, although they're also far from a solution. It's a complicated problem with a lot of potential pitfalls, but one I think is going to be critical to solve and soon because the problem isn't going away, as long as we have an internet it's here to stay.

[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 1 points 3 days ago

That's a fair conclusion to draw, but that very well might mean you have to physically fight for the outcome you want.

[–] torrentialgrain@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago

Yes, but would things have gotten this far with a more reasonable information policy? I’d argue Trump would not have gotten elected (again).

[–] r0ertel@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As some of the other posters argued, this is a slippery slope to censorship by those in power, which does not allow for dissenting opinions to propogate.

Given that free speech doesn't mean that anybody needs to listen, I feel that the problem (and solution) lies in the conduit for the free speech. I don't understand the complexities of the laws but have wondered if adjusting the laws to hold entities accountable for their actions would have a positive effect. For example, an idiot shouting from the town square has a limited audience, but if a newspaper picks up the message and promotes it, aren't they partially responsible for that message?

It gets tricky with opinion pieces, but we already have an established mechansm with newspapers' opinion pages. One potential problem is that the current media companies enjoy no accountability, no content creation costs and profits from advertisers.

On that topic, I'd even go so far as to argue that advertisers share in the accountability of providing funds to organizations that support harmful messages.

There's a lot more to this but would be interesting to see a country who has done it and if it had a net positive effect.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We have truth-in-advertising laws. You can't make claims about a product that isn't true.

Politics is just a product, being sold by a candidate. If that candidate lies about the product they "represent," and the voters rely on those promised lies, the politician should be held responsible for that lie.

For instance, HitlerPig claimed for years that he had a first-rate health care plan that was two weeks away from release. Finally, during his debate with Harris, he admitted that all they had were "concepts" of a plan. Clearly, there was never a plan at all.

Politicians should be held accountable for their deliberate lies.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

In practice I agree, but the crime of the left is being correct too early. I feel like that will play to our disadvantage when the media has cemented lies already that we'd be (I think) persecuted for correcting.

[–] Romkslrqusz@lemmy.zip 61 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Be interesting to see how this guy’s treatment compares to Luigi’s

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

4x the number of victims - he should require 4x the security, right? Bring in 4 precincts worth of police to escort him. Maybe they can requisition some of the tanks from the parade on Saturday. Just to be safe, you know?

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I expect him to be flown in via TWO helicopters and those helicopter pilots and their wives to take part in the perp walk

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Lol Walz doesn't seem like the perp walk type of governor, but it would be pretty badass given that he was on the hit list. Maybe that's my bias, but Adams looked like a doofus when he did it. Dunno who the mayors of the places are.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Well, he assassinated an member of government. That's far worse than a private citizen.

[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 23 points 3 days ago (2 children)

May the full strength of the law punish this pos.

[–] humble_boatsman@sh.itjust.works 28 points 3 days ago

I guarantee he is not charged with terrorism. And threatened in the news cycle or by Pam Bondi's office with the death penalty. His victims deaths didn't affect enough shareholders to warrant such rhetoric.

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com 22 points 3 days ago

Trump will want to pardon him

[–] hefejefe@lemm.ee 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If Luigi gets the death penalty, so should this guy.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 2 days ago

There's no evidence against Luigi

[–] mke_geek@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago

They should both be given life sentences, they both committed murder.

[–] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

collapsed inline media

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Are those guys part of the military?
Or cops with toys?

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Cops who want to kill people

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago

That doesn't narrow it down

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I see the state of Minnesota and the words "special weapons" on that guy's patch, so yeah these are the guys that would actually have the real gear to respond to stuff like this. Your everyday beat cop isn't trained for it and shouldn't carry more than pepper spray.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

ACAB.

With that out of the way, I'm ok having a specially trained and competent department or whatever to handle high pressure dangerous situations that they are equipped for literally and mentally (deescalation, negotiating, etc). Really, I think that could probably be a job for the national guard. It's unfortunate that the world has bad enough people that sometimes armed personnel are required, but it should be under trained, power hungry ~~gangsters~~ cops.

[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

So whats the chance this js just like luigi and they have the completely wrong guy by mistake or willfully.