this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
56 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9931 readers
387 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago

If this pricing model is permitted it should be forced to put products on sale when items are overstocked or expiring food is closer to its due date. Why am I paying more for salmon at dinner time but not less when it expires tomorrow?

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago

The algorithm analyzes data and determines the optimal price for products or services to maximize profits.

In that case, I'm against it.

[–] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Thank you! This is like the one thing it should have had

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have to add an attachment in order to submit. :/

Maybe I should just send a meme.

[–] thehowlingnorth@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Thanks. Gonna search my images now.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Algorithmic pricing is all about making a very small set of people richer by making all the rest of us pay more money for products.

So, fuck no.

[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's collusion out in the open

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 3 points 20 hours ago

"It's computers, so it doesn't count for some reason"

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Does this mean flyers with listed prices are now useless.

What happens when the marked price on a shelf changes when I get to the cash register. Currently I walk away from a grocery cart of food if there is any hassle at the till. They can deal with it.

How are you supposed to plan trips when the the price is always changing

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Does this mean flyers with listed prices are now useless.

Yes, and it would make price matching and planning ahead obsolete, too.

Basically, this is designed to maximize profits by “optimizing” how customers get screwed over.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

At minimum it should not be allowed to change prices while the store is open to customers. (I guess with an exception for 24/7 stores)

And/or limit the number of price changes on any item to one per 24 hours, or 2 per 7 days, or something like that.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

What about fucking cost accounting? That is closer to the truth of value than charging what you "feel". Cost accounting is transparent. Fair for everyone.

[–] teppa@piefed.ca 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So we accept that our currency is being debased by an inflation index that barely tracks real inflation, as we buy half of all mortgage bonds federally to juice home values and running QE, but we want to ban algorithms that attempt to maintain profits?

If you don't want prices to rise then perhaps a lower inflation target makes more sense. Maybe even a law that wages automatically rise with inflation. But we all know they don't want that, they would need to actually raise taxes if they did that, and housing wouldn't turn into a giant ponzi scheme that artificially boosts GDP.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How about we ban all of that crap, then? Because algorithmic pricing will be abused, we all know it because things like these always get abused because the abuse is so damn simple.

An absolute no to this

[–] teppa@piefed.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What is the outcome you want, to have prices stay the same?

I'm just saying they cant stay the same, if prices do fall then the Bank of Canada will do QE and buy mortgage bonds to push prices up, so what is it you think you are fighting by banning algorithm?