this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

Privacy

35326 readers
163 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Flock Safety’s car-tracking cameras have been spreading across the United States like an invasive species, preying on public safety fears and gobbling up massive amounts of sensitive driver data. The technology not only tracks vehicles by their license plates, but also creates “fingerprints” of each vehicle, including the make, model, color and other distinguishing features.

Through crowdsourcing and open-source research, DeFlock.me aims to “shine a light on the widespread use of ALPR technology, raise awareness about the threats it poses to personal privacy and civil liberties, and empower the public to take action.” While EFF’s Atlas of Surveillance project has identified more than 1,700 agencies using ALPRs, DeFlock has mapped out more than 16,000 individual camera locations, more than a third of which are Flock Safety devices.

Flock Safety’s cease and desist later is just the latest in a long list of groups turning to bogus intellectual property claims to silence their critics.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I’m so fucking sick of this. We need to outlaw using third party companies to get around constitutional protections. Ending the third party doctrine is just another reason we desperately need a revolution.

[–] Kalothar@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As stated above the companies name is Flock Safety

And the CEO is Garett Langley

https://www.linkedin.com/in/glangley

[–] aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] warbond@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Most of the time I don't worry about assassinations because I mostly avoid doing things that make people want to kill me. It's a decent philosophy that has served me well for decades.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What are the legal implications of hosting this information in a different jurisdiction and are there places where this data would be legally protected?

[–] whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They don't even cite the datapoints, my friend. It is a trademark infringement cease-and-desist...

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Thing is about trade marks… if the terms can be shown to be in common usage, the mark is struck down. Like Kleenex and Xerox.

So let’s all start talking about privacy invading cameras as being flocking stupid.