this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
355 points (99.4% liked)

Canada

9931 readers
350 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 10 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Yes, but that's why heat pumps in this country are typically paired with auxiliary electric heat.

Yes, and although it's not very efficient to have auxiliary electrical heat, that's a small percent of the overall year.

If you live in a home that hits -20C for 20 days per year, that's really cold! But you'll probably need the heater on for about 180 days per year at that point. Putting up with less efficiency for 20-30 days per year is still a net gain if the other 150 days of heating makes up for it.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

I mean, a resistive electric heater is still ("just") 100% efficient.

[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah but if some direct combustion of a fossil fuel is cheaper than electricity, then the actual dollars per unit heat will be cheaper with a fossil fuel source.

[–] 872XXE@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Cheaper, but less efficient. Fossil fuels have a efficiency < 1.

Question is, what’s more important for you: money or environment…

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)