this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
55 points (95.1% liked)

Linux

7509 readers
184 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (12 children)

How long do you think until Flatpak is replacing packages? I really don't like the current stultifying trend of the combination of Flatpak and immutability.

[–] uawarebrah@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (6 children)
[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago (5 children)

not op but here's my reasons: I want my apps to be able to talk to each other. So flatpak is just in the way. Also, I don't see the point of immutable distros. I could boot off of btrfs snapshots years ago. Immutability gives me absolutely nothing of value either

[–] uawarebrah@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It hugely improves privacy and security

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

How so?

The benefit is easy roll backs and roll forwards. The system is the same from a security perspective.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

no, it doesn't. Stuff doesn't have write access to / anyway. Immutability just means that I don't have write access either. Which makes no sene to me.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)