this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
61 points (75.2% liked)

Games

38335 readers
1800 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Could it be true? We’ve all been waiting so long I’m very skeptical anytime I see articles like this but this actually looks good?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world 111 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

I'll believe HL:3 is real when it is for sale, purchased by me, and played in it's entirety. And even then it might just be a particularly vivid delusion.

HL:3 is gaming's dark matter. Until all other possibilities are definitively ruled out, it's not HL:3.

[–] jyl@sopuli.xyz 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

If they're doing HL, I expect a Half-Life: <something other than 3>

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I would love it if they just called it Half Life 4

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 8 points 2 days ago

With Gaben we can't rule out this possibility

[–] ElectroLisa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago

the Postal way

[–] axh@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Half Life: π

(Almost like 3... but even more)

[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago

..or to really mess with people, Half Life: e

Since Euler’s number is a smidge under 3 (~2.72).

[–] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Half Life 2: Episode 2: Episode 1

load more comments (4 replies)