Linux

7090 readers

741 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

Fedora 42 installer defaults to btrfs? What's everyone's opinion or experience on that? (slrpnk.net)

submitted 2 days ago by AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net to c/linux@programming.dev

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Not a tech support question, I'm just curious. I recently installed it. Everything is working great, feels like I got a whole new laptop compared to my previous setup. I haven't tried out any of btrfs's unique features, so I dunno, nothing special I can report about it. Coming from Debian I was just surprized by how different Fedoras installer defaults are. Do you agree with btrfs being a default option?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

That's been the default for years

The big reason is that btrfs has more features like copy on write, snapshots, subvolumes and data validation.

It used to eat data but that's not been the case for a few years

[–] vivendi@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

Another great thing about BTRFS is that it can detect hardware problems sooner: if your BTRFS drive keeps losing data to corruption; that's because it has detected a corruption that other FS's would silently work with

load more comments (3 replies)