Linux

7107 readers

760 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

Fedora 42 installer defaults to btrfs? What's everyone's opinion or experience on that? (slrpnk.net)

submitted 2 days ago by AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net to c/linux@programming.dev

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Not a tech support question, I'm just curious. I recently installed it. Everything is working great, feels like I got a whole new laptop compared to my previous setup. I haven't tried out any of btrfs's unique features, so I dunno, nothing special I can report about it. Coming from Debian I was just surprized by how different Fedoras installer defaults are. Do you agree with btrfs being a default option?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Does it do like openSUSE and create the subvolumes and snapshots for you? Because I dread configuring these freaking things from my days in Arch, and I fell in love with openSUSE when I realised it does it for you.

(And no, the archinstall script doesn't autoconfigure BTRFS unless you wipe your entire disk)

[–] bipedalsheep@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

I was pleasantly surprised to learn this with openSUSE as well last week. It already saved my buttocks once when I messed up something with the greetd config file. Recovering from the latest working snapshot was easy. OpenSUSE is a very nice distro. Bought some merch to support them a bit.

load more comments (1 replies)