this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
45 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

7115 readers
345 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is the loss of pacman and AUR that bad?

What things are to be gained? I expect that SELinux and Redhat backing should really make fedora way more secure.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

It may be fixed and perfect, now, but I will never forgive Redhat for RPM, and by extension, every derivative. Fedora. CentOS. Anything rpm-based. I'm not a huge fan of debs, either, but I have never experienced dependency hell as bad as on rpm systems.

Lots of people like it. It's really popular for installing on a desktop configured to run an obscure, but mission-critical, service, putting the computer in a closet, and then later walling up the closet so that the physical computer can never be found again. It's great, as long as you never upgrade it.

[–] backgroundcow@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

On the topic of things to never forgive Redhat about, aren't there other things that are more pressing? Like, inventing a whole scheme to circumvent the idea of the GPL license via service contract blackmail?

[–] sxan@midwest.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, but only one of those hurt me viscerally. The other was too abstract to take precedence.

load more comments (6 replies)