this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
291 points (98.7% liked)

PC Gaming

12981 readers
612 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 108 points 2 days ago (11 children)

The meme of "Valve maintains dominance by doing nothing but waits for competition to trip over itself" is funny but they do put part of the billions they make towards beneficial products for their customers.

  • Remote Play (stream your own game from another PC)
  • Remote Play Together (can stream a game to friends without a copy of the game and play together)
  • Linux, Proton
  • Well designed hardware innovations

Not out of the goodness of their heart but to drive sales and foster a customer base willing to return.

GOG and itch do try in their own way so I have bought from them, IMO they are the only competitors making serious efforts to build a mutually benefical gaming ecosystem.

Epic, Microsoft, Ubisoft, EA and the rest are like a trapdoor with a wooden board over it. Tim Sweeney is standing there hoping you won't think he's trying to find the right time to swipe the board away and get you to fall in.

[–] halfsalesman@piefed.social 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not out of the goodness of their heart but to drive sales and foster a customer base willing to return.

I think this is partially true, but also I legit think Gabe Newell is ideologically a market anarchist that legitimately loves video games as a medium. He probably could have (more safely) made even more money doing something else considering his early Microsoft connections and ability but he didn't.

Unfortunately as a result, the moment hes dead Valve might be in trouble long term. Depends on who takes over afterward and how they want to direct Valve. Pierre-Loup Griffais or Lawrence Yang seem possible given how successful Steam Deck has been. Its hard to get a read on them. They seem smart and well meaning though.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Based on what I've heard of the internal structure of Valve, there's a good chance he's helped foster enough an environment of "doing what you love" that it'd survive him retiring/dying. Maybe not forever, but at least for a long while after he's gone.

And hopefully by that time they've built up the open source community enough that even if Valve turned bad they wouldn't be able to do much damage

load more comments (8 replies)