this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
58 points (100.0% liked)

Hacker News

3136 readers
598 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago (11 children)

Yes, this is 100% accurate!

To the downvoters, please don't just downvote, give me a plausible scenario of when harvesting water from air is more useful than just cleaning existing water.

Condensating water is VERY energy intensive, filtering far less so.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

People just want it to be true. They're willing to buy into the scam.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yeah, I remember watching Thunderf00t's videos on Fontus and the other stupid shit

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I would not put any stock in anything Thunderfoot claims, he's a grifter and makes profoundly dumb arguments.

Source is biased obviously, but contains many, many references: https://skepchick.org/2025/01/thunderf00t-is-still-an-ignorant-loser/

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Nah, he was right then and is still right. The anti feminism thing was a weird tangent that a lot of the skeptic channels did go down for a while. Then a lot of them continued down that road and became alt right. Thunderf00t did not.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Remember that a person can be a dick and still be correct.

I did find his rant about feminism to be annoying and over the top, but when it comes to science, like it or not, he has plenty of credentials.

But since you dismiss him so easily, please tell me what he is wrong about with regards to water from air tech.

load more comments (6 replies)