this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2025
1072 points (99.6% liked)

Science Memes

17476 readers
548 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (22 children)

A non-predator mammal with front facing eyes: llamas.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Pandas as well. Non-predator but clearly front facing eyes.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Pandas are descendants of omnivores with a predator streak, them rat fucking their diet to near koala levels of bad doesn't really factor in yet.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Idk if "descendants of omnivores" counts because then you could exclude a number of critters like pigs for being "descendants of herbivores" and then 'why do pigs have forward facing eyes?'

The obvious caveat is that pandas at the minimum don't have selective pressure for side eyes or they have something pressuring stereoscopic vision even more similar to how aquatic animals have less selective pressure for forward facing eyes.

I would imagine the way pandas eat bamboo stalks is more visual than most herbivores and that alone could help them retain steroscopic vision.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago

I was trying to imply that pandas did it recently enough for such pressures to not have kicked in yet. Probably should've specified that a bit better.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)