this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
285 points (97.7% liked)

politics

26226 readers
2261 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a post from July, Trump proclaimed: "I am pleased to announce that, after the involvement of President Donald J. Trump, both Countries have reached a CEASEFIRE and PEACE. Congratulations to all! By ending this War, we have saved thousands of lives."

However, the reality was starkly different. Two weeks after Trump's initial celebration, artillery exchanges resulted in a significant death toll, with widespread injuries and the displacement of hundreds of thousands of civilians.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 day ago (5 children)

" China has assisted Cambodia and Thailand in our own way to resolve the border dispute, and we continue to promote peace talks to address other pressing issues in the region."

Trump, seemingly oblivious to the nuanced diplomatic correction, responded by calling Xi his "longtime friend" and a "great leader", expressing enthusiasm about potential trade deals.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

This has some additional layers. It's not just Trump. Since the Soviet Union fell, the US has been expected to be the world police force, including being a mediator in disputes like this.

It makes somewhat more sense for China to be there, since it's in their backyard, but nobody is asking for the US to be there. With Trump in charge, they'd rather prefer not.

Which is a big shift. Even with Bush Jr and all his bullshit, other countries did generally expect the US to be involved diplomatically in things like this. That's now going away.

I'd say it's a good thing, but not if China is going to be the world police force instead. It should be a multipolar world.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

The US hasn't been "expected" to be the world police.

It has done it purely for its own ends, just as Russia and China do.

[–] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

I feel like "expect" is being conflated with "want" because you can expect things you don't want.

If anything understanding the motivations of a thing is the first step to expecting actions from it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)