this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
316 points (98.5% liked)
A Boring Dystopia
14231 readers
29 users here now
Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.
Rules (Subject to Change)
--Be a Decent Human Being
--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title
--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article
--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.
--Posts must have something to do with the topic
--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.
--No NSFW content
--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm thinking it would be a great idea to power nuclear plants, which are desperately needed, but...
Trump's selling plutonium as if it's a regular resource, like iron ore or timber.
So what if any of this material slips out? Dirty bombs aside, I don't think it's too hard to make an implosion device. 3-stage thermonuclear is a whole different game, but a Trinity style bomb is 80-yo tech. Don't think one needs the hyper-precise tooling, timers, exotic materials, etc. Anyone know more than I?
You don't want to look up how many orphan nuclear devices exist in the world.
Just to whet your whistle a bit... this is by no means an exhaustive list. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_orphan_source_incidents
We're still discovering lost nuclear power devices from the collapse of the Soviet Union. Nuclear accidents have happened from abandoned medical radiotherapy machines, and from radio imaging equipment used in industrial applications. It's not actually that hard to find nuclear material in the wild you could use in a dirty bomb.
Yeah, but those things are not weapons-grade plutonium, either.
That just means it is purified enough to be usable in a weapon. There's also lots of different plutonium isotopes, each with various suitability to weapons vs energy.
We need a lot more info to have an informed conversation than a blanket statement like "weapons-grade plutonium". And I definitely don't trust any major media outlet journalist at this point to have any idea what the fuck they're talking about, especially with regards to anything nuclear. They regularly get things wrong or even completely backwards from reality with less complicated topics.
Especially since the actual Financial Times article that uses that phrase being referenced by this article, is locked behind a paywall.
There's also just the fact that "weapons grade" just means it's useful for a fission weapon. Nothing's stopping you from taking that cobalt-60 you found in that Therac at Daryl's junkyard, strapping it to an IED, and using that as a dispersal device to give a lot of people radiation poisoning or whatever (the traditional "dirty bomb").