this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2025
91 points (92.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

37937 readers
2423 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

i was going to write an essay, but idk if even I would read it, so im gonna take a nap instead

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago (4 children)

We never stop being kids.

And we never fully become adults, in a sense. For there's always room to grow, people & situations to understand, things and perspectives to learn about, and further maturity to be reached.

[–] loldog191@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i think kids should be allowed to vote. from the moment we're born, we should have a say. we have adults that act like crybabies anyways, so it balances out.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We already have an enormous problem of completely unqualified voters being able to vote, so let's not make it even worse. (in the States, anyway)

[–] loldog191@lemmy.ca 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

ive given this A LOT of dwell time and thought, and i think we're both partially right and wrong.

even when the negatives outweigh the positives, some things are worth doing. every solution is just accounting for as many of the things that can go wrong as we can imagine. but even when things go wrong, we can always fix it. your democracy has gone wrong, and it isn't enough to just point out the things going wrong. you have to fix it too.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 1 points 23 hours ago

There's also practical application and real-world effect to consider. Giving kids the vote wouldn't help the situation, and in fact wouldn't happen anyway, even if the last remaining legit party was in charge, here.

Now in theory, if you wanted to set up some kind of voting application test to see how well the potential voter was familiar with real facts & reality, allowing them to vote if they passed, then that might indeed be an argument for lowering the voting age. In fact, it almost would have saved democracy in the 2016 election, as I alluded to above.

load more comments (2 replies)