this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2025
0 points (NaN% liked)

Political Memes

9739 readers
5123 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

I agree, that's why we need to replace around 70% of them, maybe 80%

[–] Vape_Or_Wave@leminal.space 1 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Sounds better to start a whole new party instead of fight the entrenched majority.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Howso? Most people understand that third parties are counterproductive spoilers and won't risk it. You have to destroy one of the entrenched majorities first if you want a new party to accomplish anything.

[–] OutForARip@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Surely you destroy one of the major entrenched parties by not voting for them and instead voting for someone else who can than take their place.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, it's an absolutely unhinged argument to suggest that the only way to a multi-party democracy is to move to a one-party system first. They haven't thought it through at all.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 weeks ago

someone else who can than take their place.

That's the kicker. If you don't have a clean, single-cycle transition then you're handing control to your worst enemies.

If we're going to fracture a party, let's fracture the right. Destroy the worse one first, then siphon from the less worse one once the fracture takes.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)