this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
123 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3520 readers
473 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes/pics of text

Post news related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One environmental attorney said that the EPA proposal "prioritizes chemical industry profits and utility companies' bottom line over the health of children and families across the country."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If a life is worth $10,000,000. And PFAs are reducing lives by at least 3 years depending on the chemicals. That's roughly 4% of a life. If 77% of the population drink tap water in some form, that's about 267,000,000 people losing $400,000 of their lives. And that's before you factor in $50 billion dollars in health care costs that come from PFAs, and will only increase. (We'll leave that out)

To put it simply maybe we should sue the government in a class action lawsuit for $106.8 trillion if they are not putting protections in place to insure those people aren't stolen from.

[–] GooseGang@beehaw.org 8 points 2 months ago

Let’s say they don’t care about other people at all (which honestly at this point is pretty clear) the direct economic losses due to this change will be major. Short-term profit over long-term wellbeing, similar to the pandemic.