this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
373 points (99.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

26332 readers
1655 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bastion@feddit.nl 9 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

This is kinda absolute BS at this point, though.

Mongo has acid transactions, and has for years now. Although this is only within the same database, there are plenty of dbms (including rdbms) that don't support cross-database transactions.

Mongo also, since time immemorial, has had "write concern" to ensure that it's written to disk (to the journal) before the transaction is completed.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So is it just another database software at this point, then?

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

With a JS-based query language, yeah

[–] bastion@feddit.nl 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, ish. There are aspects of it that are really valuable, and fit some use cases extremely well. But, in some senses, yes. Like any DBMS, you've got to know it's strengths and weaknesses. And if you do, there are definitely circumstances where you'd choose it over others. But not always.

load more comments (1 replies)