this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
1622 points (99.4% liked)

Work Reform

12891 readers
4 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 28 points 1 week ago (23 children)

Does anyone here actually see productivity improvements to their roles from using AI?

I'm a telecoms engineer and I see limited use cases in my role for AI. If I need to process data then I need something that can do math reliably. For document generation I can only reliably get it to build out a structure and even then I've more than likely got an existing document the I can use as a structure template.

Network design, system specification and project engineering are all so specific to the use case and have so few examples provided in public data sets that anything AI outputs is usually nonsense.

Am I missing some use cases here?

Also, if you do see productivity improvements from AI, why would you tell your employer? They want a 5 day working week but they know what they expect to be achieved in that week, so that's what they get.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I feel like AI is just going to end up replacing interns or entry level people, it can do easy tasks that would take a while by hand to do. Which based on how bad the job market seems to have been for people like me just trying to enter it somewhat makes sense.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah the whole missing entry level job thing for most industries is going to backfire with exploding wages for experienced people. Without training grads and apprentices there's an ever decreasing pool of experienced people to pick from.

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yep but of course companies don't care about it right now as right now it allows them to be more profitable in the immediate term.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Yeah we've structured the system so companies are mostly only responsible to shareholders, and shareholders really only care about short term gains with their only liability from the company is financial. Companies are always going have a focus on short term gains because thats what the system demands.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)