this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
1622 points (99.4% liked)

Work Reform

12891 readers
2 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 28 points 1 week ago (23 children)

Does anyone here actually see productivity improvements to their roles from using AI?

I'm a telecoms engineer and I see limited use cases in my role for AI. If I need to process data then I need something that can do math reliably. For document generation I can only reliably get it to build out a structure and even then I've more than likely got an existing document the I can use as a structure template.

Network design, system specification and project engineering are all so specific to the use case and have so few examples provided in public data sets that anything AI outputs is usually nonsense.

Am I missing some use cases here?

Also, if you do see productivity improvements from AI, why would you tell your employer? They want a 5 day working week but they know what they expect to be achieved in that week, so that's what they get.

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 9 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Claude can spit out powershell scripts up to like, 400 or 500 lines without errors or with minimal, easily debugged errors. Adds things like error correction, colored text, user interaction, comments the code pretty well. Saves me hours every time I fire it up, so that I can in turn save myself dozens of hours with the scripts themselves.

But as far as I tell my boss, there is no AI use, and that's how we're keeping that for now/indefinitely

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

That's pretty great, what kind of things do you use the PowerShell scripts for?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)