At the moment they are pretty much the same thing. The big shitty bill passed the House because three House Democrats died in office so far this term. Is that not a problem?
We would not have so much aged representation if the party didn't put so much favor on seniority. We can have some old leadership, which is actually a good thing, but the party currently looks like a make a wish foundation for elderly politicians.
I don't think seniority and ageism are the same thing, but a lot of proponents and opponents will take it that way. I think it's really about how positions of leadership are parceled out based on time served.
Shit! I just paid for a vassecectomy!
Well, it is her turn.
You appear to be missing what this is. The title is a bit misleading. It does nothing at all to prevent the courts from issuing injunctions, it just makes it impossible for the courts to enforce the injunctions they issue. The judiciary can do whatever it wants, and the executive can just ignore it. They are writing into the law that the executive can ignore the law.
Your argument was that fascists can destroy a lot of incremental change in a short while. I’m agreeing with you.
Not exactly. My argument is that incremental changes get swept away easily, while large systemic changes can't, and are actually very difficult to sweep away incrementally too. Republicans have been seething about Social Security and Medicare since they were introduced, and up until now they have stood largely in-assailable. Even over the last 50 years, as all the wealth of middle America has been stripped away and siphoned to the top, Republicans have been afraid to touch them. They won't last much longer, but it will have taken driving the entire federal government into bankruptcy to do it.
I would say there’s plenty of evidence against it from the dawn of civilization...
I guess I should have specified modern politics, which have a lot of differences from ancient and even pre-Internet civilizations. Still, I don't think it changes much with my arguments. Don't be complaining about this getting long though, when you blow up the scope so broadly. I'm going to cherry pick Rome, but I'm pretty sure I can make the case with any of them.
The Roman Colosseum is certainly one of the longest standing achievements in the world. It took 8 years to construct, and was commissioned by Emperor Vespasian 3 years after taking office. There was no dragging of feet on the politics there but, for my argument, the more interesting aspect is "why" it was built. Rome was in a state of upheaval and had gone through three emperors in less than 2 years. Vespasian took office with weak public support, and needed a great symbol to back up his public image campaign. He ruled for 10 years until his death, and was was succeeded by his son.
The same kind of stories exist for the Pantheon and many of the largest roman roads and aqueducts.
Cuba, Poland, Iraq, the EU and Australia have all also had immense growth and development in the last century in tandem with stability.
For some definition of "stability" maybe. All of those have gone through changes that absolutely dwarf things like Medicare for All.
So my point still stands, in the US, at least one party has spent decades tearing down, and from the looks of it one of them never tried to build anything up.
What was your point again? Are you disagreeing with something I said? The American working class has been absolutely crushed over the last 50 years, mostly but not entirely at the hands of Republicans. I never said otherwise, but Democrats are still working from the same failed strategy book that has been entirely ineffective.
Yet, the population continues to vote this way. It’s hard not to see it as voluntary; In that much time, accessing as much free information and thought as the US has, you can’t really claim to be ignorant of differing information, other than willfully.
Interesting theory, but how exactly does blaming the voters provide the Democrats with a working strategy going forward? It's nothing but political masturbation to blame voters. It doesn't matter because these are still the voters that Democrats need. This is designed to make smug Democrats feel good while doing nothing to correct the course of the country.
I have a similar opinion of American voters, but I look for what can be used to get them back on the right track. If you feed political junkies like me and perhaps yourself with a bunch of statistics, we will of course come to the conclusion that voting for the Democrats is the only sane thing to do. The problem is that most voters aren't political junkies, and the only news they get is slop from Fox, CNN, and MSNBC, unless they get sucked into the Republican disinformation machine online. Republicans have invested massively in online "information" resources, while Democrats (speaking of the establishment) have done everything they can to cripple anything left of center online. It's no surprise that the American voting public is so turned around.
Voters want leadership and symbolism. Democrats have provided neither, and Republicans have provided both in spades. I can go deeper into this if you are interested.
If both ruling parties are that obviously corrupt, why is there no action?
I never mentioned corruption at all but, since you went there, I guess I need to lay out my position on corruption. Republicans and Democrats are both corrupt, but it really seems like there ought to be different words to describe each. Republicans embody corruption from top to bottom, and they barely try to hide it. I don't think any politician who still calls themselves a Republican has any goal for their time in office other than to profit from corruption. Democrats (with a few exceptions) do not seek corruption, but every aspect of their institutions has been corrupted by their reliance on, and association with, big money donors. Even their thinking on political strategy has been compromised. I have no doubt at all that President Biden saw himself as the political equivalent of Captain America, yet he led us all to right where we are today. If I told you in 2020, as I told many people, that we might end up better off if Trump won than Biden, you would have thought I was insane or a Republican bot, but it turned out I was right. I honestly didn't think the fascist who took power in 2024 would be Trump v2, but I knew it would be somebody, and that Biden would not be up to the challenge.
Just a personal note: I've been making these arguments for over 20 years now, and others have been doing it much longer. It's been like watching a slow motion car crash watching the inevitable play out and being powerless to stop it. I'm soul weary at this point, and I don't see the path that gets us out of this mess. I have no idea what is going to happen in the coming years, but I don't see how it will be good. I have two kids in their 20s, and I really fear for their future. I don't know why I'm still making the same old arguments because, even if the Democrats reformed overnight, I don't see how it will be fast enough.
The general principle that building takes more time than destroying is pretty solid - in general. However, applying it to politics is absolutely insane.
You ever hear that war is politics by other means? That's a good principle too, and the reverse is what applies here. Politics is war by other means. Republicans know that. They are fighting a war and Democrats are dutifully putting up villages they can't defend. The clever villagers are defecting before the tanks roll in.
As I already pointed out, what you "think" stands in absolute contrast with everything that's happened in politics in this country and globally for at least the last 100 years. If you and people like you don't wake up, we are all fucked. (Assuming we aren't already).
Reasserting what you think, instead of addressing my arguments, puts you at the same level of rationality as MAGA. The country didn't get the way it is by magic. Democrats hollowed out voters skulls, then Republicans filled them. Remember that when you complain about what the country wants.
I don't think anybody expected Biden to be that good and, no, that's not the point of the criticisms at all. The point is that the establishment is guaranteed to wheel out another Biden in 3 years and it's critical that we shut that down.
You are far from the only person operating on that theory of gradual change, but it's dead wrong and exactly what brought us to where we are today. In fact, it's exactly what leads to fascism every single time it ascends. Weak neoliberals fail to take care of people, and the people turn against them.
Look at how much gradual change the fascists are able to tear down in the span of a few months. What are they afraid to tear down? Social Security and Medicare. It's the big changes that rapidly gain the popularity needed to survive right wing onslaught. Everything else dies.
Oh please. Biden didn't just live with the Trump aftermath, in many cases he chose to keep pushing it. He was a mixed bag, doing a lot of great things that Trump never would have, but he did a lot of bad without anybody twisting his arm.
The bill is horrible enough on it's face. Tipping culture is a cancer. This just cements it in place. Why should two people with identical earnings pay different amounts of tax just because one got it in tips always? This is bullshit based on yet another Trump brain fart on stage.
It's also perfect for running adds against anyone who votes against it, so I have no doubt it will pass.
way not knowledgeable than Vance.
Nailed it! :)
It was just some gallows humor. Real tiny gallows.