politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Chinga la migra
... with the same unlubed dildo of consequences that's waiting on Putin, Trump, and a bunch of Epstein accomplices.
Ratas
It took me a moment to remember that ratas is Spanish for rats so I was wondering what Estonian politician Jüri Ratas has anything to do with this, given that he's more of a bag of hot air than a dictator.
ICE, DHS, and Border Patrol coming in and invading our blue cities, alongside the National Guard sent from red states to blue states sounds like what exactly? A civil war.
But only one side it participating, that being the red state invaders. Unless there were at least one murked ICE agent by an organized attack, or a blue state pulled an offensive maneuver, there's no revolution here.
This article states it's witnessing revolution, when this country hasn't even organized a GENERAL STRIKE by now. Should've happened before Chuck Schumer cucked us out during the government shutdown.
We have some wins to be projected thanks to elections, but an article titled like this is just particularly useless hopium, and gets in the way of the real deal if there are no more free and fair elections.
It seems more like a proxy civil war. DHS and Ice are invading blue cities and states to terrorize those residents, but plenty of blue states have passed state laws to counter the shit happening in other red states and at the federal level. (New York passed "abortion shield" laws, to protect patients and providers offering or receiving abortion care in NY from legal repercussions (civil or criminal) initiated by states with abortion bans.) We have sanctuary cities. We have blue cities/states instructing their police not to assist ICE/DHS. People within those cities and states are also fighting back with neighborhood watches and protecting each other from ICE/DSS. To say that blue states/cities aren't fighting back is disingenuous.
The tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of patriots. It will come to violence, I don't see this ending any other way. The people that are openly opposing trump and his bullshit are trying to do it via civil disobedience, instead of violence. Violence just gives the right fuel to call the left terrorists and demonize the movement, along with an excuse to institute martial law. Civil disobedience gives the movement more credit. Black people during the civil rights movement and MLK recognized this. They knew violence would demonize, and therefore jeopardize what they were trying to accomplish.
Yes civil disobedience is out on display, and it's phenomenal, but it's not enough; like MLK's movement, there has to be enough organizing for at least a strike, a general strike. We can't pretend that, using your example, Hochul's push for laws protecting abortion rights in NY are enough with her corporate Democrat sentiments capitulating to the right; she's going to undermine some of Mamdani's more ambitious plans for NYC, and I don't anticipate maximum resistance from her when defending her constituents against fascists. And sanctuary cities are the ones under attack my friend, they've been "sanctuary cities" for a long time. That's why they're going after them.
Bipartisanship is dead, and we need fighters, as peacefully as it can possibly be done. Right now until further notice with Mamdani's inauguration, so far the NYPD has been cooperative with ICE as well; we can't count on our leaders to apply pressure for us right now, and we have to use our leverage.
A more honorable response to Trump and ICE has been Illinois, with Gov. Pritzker and Mayor Johnson. They have the right messaging, they have the right constituents defending their communities in Chicago, and the Chicago PD is pissed enough at ICE to not cooperate (with no arrests of ICE agents, mind you), but it has not been enough to kill the momentum. We NEED to use our leverage.
On a side note at least, it would appear from the outside that military does not hold as much confidence in their commander and chief as Trump hoped. A blanket use of marshal law doesn't appear possible with the White House's ambitions of foreign policy. It truly is spectacular implosion to be witnessing.
These are the titles I like to see!
That's why they used it despite the fact it's absolute bullshit - we're nowhere near an actual revolution because we're too distracted by shit like social media to get wound up enough.
We’re too distracted by Epstein or participation trophies or ballrooms or…
Revolution is in the air.
Sure, and any day now I'm going to lay a giant golden egg and fly away on my skydragon to never-never-land where I'll live with elves.
Meanwhile some mysterious, highly charismatic and intelligent stranger we never met nor talked about will magically appear and have a full set of perfect progressive values that everyone can agree on and yet have no qualms about using violence to achieve those values. We will have clear-cut borders and divides between the people who are opposed to the new regime and those mighty leftist warriors who always march-lockstep with whatever leader we elect.
In today's western democracies leader cults and charismatic authoritarianism tends to cluster on the right, not the left, despite what the "both sides!" people want to believe.
Donald Trump is the obvious endpoint of pseudopopulist anti-intellectual conservatism. Thankfully the US got there first, so we can all see where the conservatives around the world are headed.
Thankfully the US got there first, so we can all see where the conservatives around the world are headed.
I really wish that it would realistically serve as an international warning, but I'd be surprised if the scourge of weaponizing atomized worldviews and the attention-span erosion hasn't seeped into every corner of the developed world. Corporations are the engine that drive this trend of fear mongering and authoritarian rule, and even if we see a bit of pushback here and there, they don't recognize borders and see every nation as a ripe field to reap and have more patience and resources than any progressive group.
American revolution? They should be talking about a civil war.
We need another underground railroad at this point.
TRANScontinental railroad; to help relocate TRANS ppl, LGBT ppl, and liberal women.
I guess if you believe that the American war for Independence was a "people's revolution", then anything makes sense.
The American Revolution happened because Americans didn't want to repay Britain for its help in the French and Indian War.
We've been dying for tax cuts for our rulers ever since the country's inception.
Revolution seems to ne conflated with an angry tweet while in line at the drive thru at Burger King.
