this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2025
516 points (99.4% liked)

politics

26628 readers
1522 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] portnull@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Let's just do away with law and courts and such. Releasing evidence would incriminate people and prove they are guilty.

Where's the offramp for this timeline?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Where’s the offramp for this timeline?

May I reccomend you watch the movie Odiocracy.

[–] portnull@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

You may. Will give it a watch. Thanks.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Do you mean Idiocracy?

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Long as it hurts him, let it FLOW

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 days ago

RELEASING the Epstein files will hurt ~~Children!~~ ~~Rape Victims!~~ ~~Poor People!~~ ~~Non Rapists!~~ People of some Sort!

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I think Trump meant there are a lot of everyday people in the files, you know firemen, teachers, engineers , those sort of people and since he's charged with protecting his people he just wants to... I'm sorry there's just no way to justify NOT hurting the pedophiles. The victims have already come out in favor of this so I don't see that argument holding water.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›