this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2025
141 points (98.6% liked)

politics

26579 readers
1681 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 90 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

He's an unqualified, paychopathic piece of shit and a fucking war criminal and the best the US media can do is speculate that maybe the deranged toddler-in-chief might maybe not support him quite as much as he used to because maybe a few of the brazenly traitorous Republican scumbags in Congress might actually take issue with him.

2025 is going to go down in history as the year that the US dropped all pretense of being rational or legitimate and went full bug-eyed insane.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

and the best the US media can do is speculate that maybe the deranged toddler-in-chief might maybe not support him quite as much as he used to because maybe a few of the brazenly traitorous Republican scumbags in Congress might actually take issue with him

While also doing some drive by racism on Native Americans with a stupidly written racist ass headline

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Every continent with people had some culture that took scalps.

If you expand that to any trophy taking... Well, the game knuckle bones might have started with sheep bones, but soldiers throughout the ages have played it with bones from humans.

All that said, the European Colonizers did pay bounties on scalps of anyone with native seeming hair and skin color.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 52 points 10 hours ago

“The people around the president have always sensed that Hegseth isn’t really qualified for the job,” this person added. “But he’s redeemed himself in the eyes of the president because he is truly devoted to Trump. That goes a long way.”

What a wonderful world we live in.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 20 points 10 hours ago

Pete Hegseth is a murderer.

[–] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago

Maybe because he was never qualified. That’s like hiring a shift manager to be the new ceo.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago (5 children)

Besides being on the TV, what were Hegseth's "qualifications"?

[–] sausager@lemmy.world 22 points 9 hours ago

He's a Nazi

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 hours ago

Same as the presidents

[–] 2piradians@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

Twerking on Trump's ego like the rest of em

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

His primary qualification is that he was an officer (eventually reaching the rank of Major) in the Army National Guard, via ROTC, and volunteered to serve in Guantanamo and Iraq during the War on Terror.

I highly encourage people to compare and contrast his service record with that of Jim Mattis, or any other appointee to the same office in recent history, for additional context.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

He was a Major. That's not a rank with much in the way of responsibility. And he only served two years of weekends at that rank. The rest of the time at that rank was as an inactive reserve.

So his actual command experience was as a captain. That's command of between 50 and 200 people.

Except that's not true either, because Hegseth's entire time as Captain was as a teacher in the counter insurgency school in Kabul.

So his only experience leading people seems to have been as a lieutenant, and I can tell you, no one respects a lieutenant.

So yeah, his entire reason for being picked for that role was his loyalty to Trump.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Trump uses the technique of employing people who are vastly under qualified, because their selfishness in wanting to keep their position requires their loyalty to the guy who saved them from being a low subscriber podcaster or ambulance chasing attorney.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

Mob boss mentality.

Smart dictators try to breed both competence and loyalty. I'm glad that Trump and his handlers are not smart.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Trump calls him Bubba?