this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
27 points (81.4% liked)

Technology

77090 readers
2539 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

How can society police the global spread of online far-right extremism while still protecting free speech? That’s a question policymakers and watchdog organizations confronted as early as the 1980s and ’90s – and it hasn’t gone away.

Decades before artificial intelligence, Telegram and white nationalist Nick Fuentes’ livestreams, far-right extremists embraced the early days of home computing and the internet. These new technologies offered them a bastion of free speech and a global platform. They could share propaganda, spew hatred, incite violence and gain international followers like never before.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

"Before the Internet" in a headline and then 2 paragraphs later "using the Internet". Bravo.

collapsed inline media

And confusing "the Internet" with the http protocol shows a total lack of basic knowledge and also a wonderful teaching moment to incorporate into your article. Missed opportunity in a race to crank out drivel and get some AI seo traffic.

[–] dukemirage@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s usually called the Web though, not http as only one of the technical details involved.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

That's 100% a better term to use. I just always feel silly when I say it in my head because it's ambiguous as fuck for me.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Right? The term online didn't really enter the vernacular until the internet was a thing.

While I agree with "Fuck Nazis" the headline is shit

[–] termaxima@slrpnk.net 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

YES ! Drink the AI kool-aid, you fools ! Drown yourselves in it, if you please. Do what you do best and surrender your humanity to a new master ! Stupid fascists.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 2 points 9 hours ago

Makes sense they would. They can’t create only coopt.

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think this is right-wing specific. You could probably draw similar conclusions coming from an Islamist angle. And this so-called AI is going to be next "frontier" is not all that clear to me yet. It's a nebulous threat at this stage that starts with a lot of "imagine if" arguments. We don't know yet. It's worth paying attention. But we don't know if HitLLMer chatbots are going to cause more damage than the concentration camp simulation games that preceded them.

There is a good 15% of people who are drank the koolaid right-wing believers. I don't think that number has changed much in the last century. The number that changes is how many of the less extreme or undecided people in the middle they can convince they're right.

The internet is only as regulated as the least regulating country on this planet. So all it takes is a tiny island nation or a principality left over in time to break the chain. It's also conceivable (imagine if!) that a fine, upstanding citizen like Elon Musk uses the change he found in his couch cushions to circumvent any regulatory efforts anywhere to distribute otherwise regulated content via his private satellite network. The answer cannot be "let's limit speech more." The answer must be "fight back with truth and facts." If asshole ideologists use all the digital tools available to spread their bullshit, we need to fund initiatives that counter that speech with the same tools.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The whole concept of drowning out bad information with good information doesn't work. It was just a theory about communication that has been proven wrong countless times.