this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
0 points (50.0% liked)

Technology

77090 readers
1823 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 11 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

It’s a user-friendly wrapper for existing fake quantum. It’s not a “physics shortcut” and it doesn’t “tackle quantum problems.”

Also no quantum problems have ever been “reserved for AI.” Some quantum solutions borrow optimization techniques from machine learning, but classical machine learning algorithms aren’t designed to leverage (or even consider) quantum effects.

I’m putting this out there because there’s a tendency to lump together all the buzzwords, like AI and quantum, into one big category of powerful-technologies-I-don’t-understand that results in hyperbolic projections and magical thinking that thwarts progress.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 1 points 8 hours ago

The only quantum problem reserved for AI that I know of returned the answer '42'.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Guys it's a lookup table. Whoop de fucking do.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

But it's framed in terms of "quantum" and "AI" so WOWOWOWOWOWOZZAZAXXAZAZOZOAA MAGGGGIIICCCCKKKK!!!!

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Clearly some techbro wants to monetize buzzwords plus laptop.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

So you can't actually solve problems. You can just look up previously solved problems.

What a clever idea to write the results of an experiment down.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I mean it's not that sinister.

It's just not impressive in the slightest. Like, we still use lookup tables for trigonometry functions

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

making it easier to run complex simulations without relying on supercomputers or artificial intelligence (AI) tools.

I stopped reading there. Is it any good?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

It's got nothing to do with artificial intelligence, the writer of the article is just an idiot.

What quantum mechanical problem would an LLM be able to assist with? We don't understand quantum mechanics all that well so how would an AI trained on a data be any better? Truly stupid article.