this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2025
1288 points (99.3% liked)

Science Memes

17598 readers
1020 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 94 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Pika is a real animal?

Gen 1 pokemon really are just funny colored real animals.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 86 points 2 days ago

“Ekans” is just “Snake” spelled backwards.

“Muk” is just…oh, oh god

collapsed inline media

[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pika is pronounced "pie-kuh" generally. Pikachu comes from pika pika (japanese onomatopoeia for "sparking/sparkling" usually with the connotation of clean) + chuu (sound a mouse makes/squeak).

[–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Actually it comes from pika(-tto), the onomatopoeia for a lightning strike.

[–] Cintari@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not according to an interview by the creator of Pikachu, Atsuko Nishida:

“Since it was an Electric-type Pokémon, I thought ‘pika‘ [the expression of light flashing in Japanese].

https://web.archive.org/web/20211108083831/https://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-news/creator-profile-the-creators-of-pikachu/

[–] SorryQuick@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Actually, name of many Pokemon are multi layered

So there is no wrong, but both right

It is the beauty of Pokemon names and even concepts

Watch some lockstin and gnoggin if interested in this topic 😇

[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Yeah I just think it's kind of neat how the names of English pokemon are formed in a similar way to how they are in Japanese.

[–] CidVicious@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think these are the same root? Pika pika is used to mean clean but it's onomatopoeia for sparkling. That double word onomatopoeia construction in japanese doesn't really have a direct analogue in English I don't think.

[–] stray@pawb.social 1 points 2 days ago

They're the same. The "pika" is from "hika", which refers to light.

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Voltorb, Muk, Magnemite, and Mr Mime would all like a word with you. Jynx, however, doesn't mind.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Oh they brought a lot of love alright

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Bigger lens is better for wildlife photography and long distance shot. Animals scurry away when you try to get close, so it's best to take a picture from the distance.

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Confusingly, there is the animal in the post that is commonly called pika (Ochotona daurica). What I had to think of first was Pica pica though (the Eurasian magpie)

[–] Lembot_0005@lemy.lol 41 points 3 days ago (1 children)

When you stare into pica, pica stares into you. Also sprach Zarathustra.

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Lembot_0005@lemy.lol 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Zarathustra sprach only once.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Casually using an amazing photo for a meme 👍

[–] HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago

A top-shelf flex.

[–] Prontomomo@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I like the content, but seriously I’m baffled as to how this is a science meme?

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I would assume because it's related to educating someone about why optical lenses can give an incredible amount of detail that digital just can't compete with. But that's just a guess and that might not even be enough for this forum

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What's a digital lens exactly?.. The only thing I can think of are in some point& shoot cameras and phones they have fake factorial zooms that are just cropping into the resolution.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i'm guessing it was a brain shortcut for a "digital zoom lens"

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Absolutely correct

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Also, because posts like this drive really informative comment sections like this thread. I promise there's a method to the madness.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

~~you people do understand it is fake, and if you zoom on the top right eye, it is not the same as bottom right, right?~~

ok, so to my surprise, it seems to be possible. the difference in the eye may be result of multiple layers of shitty jpeg compression.

collapsed inline media

the author has more pictures on his web - https://www.pjvphotography.com/Fauna/Pikas

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago

it is though

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 days ago

☺️compression did nothing wrong

You are not supposed to zoom into a compressed photo 🤭

[–] DearMoogle@lemmy.today 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Mountains in the eye of a trailside pika, ...

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 5 points 2 days ago

Eating seeds as a pastime activity

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

moments lost, like tears in rain

good bye

now I gotta watch blade runner again dammit! RIP Rutger Olsen Hauer for that performance god DAMN!

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What does it say, when it sneezes?

[–] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago

Tap for spoilerPi

Ka

Chuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu!

[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

beautiful 🤌

[–] GreatTitEnthusiast@mander.xyz 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] halfdane@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Today's risky click is presented by GreatTitEnthusiast 👀

[–] GreatTitEnthusiast@mander.xyz 7 points 2 days ago

Hey, I'm just hear because I heard climate change is threatening Great Tits

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why 600mm? Because sometimes you need really good photos of squirrels.

collapsed inline media

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] falseWhite@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

You can also see them directly, with your own eyes

[–] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

but the pika is cute >.<

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

Follow for more life hacks

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Big, if true

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Laughs in micro fourthirds.

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Listen buddy, I spent a lot of money on my full frame, and a lot of muscle lugging it around, so I'd appreciate it if you could keep your superior sensor to yourself.

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's not even that much of a sacrifice. There are some modern 600s that weigh less than what a typical 70-200/2.8 does. Granted, they're on the darker side, but if you have the light (supposedly you will during a hike), you don't always need an f/4.

load more comments
view more: next ›