This feels so backwards.
this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
274 points (99.3% liked)
World News
51013 readers
1581 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
- Blogsites are treated in the same manner as social media sites. Medium, Blogger, Substack, etc. are not valid news links regardless of who is posting them. Yes, legitimate news sites use Blogging platforms, they also use Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube and we don't allow those links either.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It’s always japan. They rushed everything except culture in the race
Well a monarchy is backwards and women not being allowed to become monarch is also backwards... So then we're looking forward, right?
If she chooses to abolish the monarchy? totally.
If not, this just seems like royalty PR campaign.
Would her teenage brother becoming the next Emperor be more likely to accelerate the decline of the monarchy?
Crazy to think this family started WW2 with the Nazis and here we are talking about how she should be able to be empress.
The Japanese Imperial family is still in power because the US found them a useful tool for controlling the Japanese population after the war. Also she is not responsible for the sins/crimes of her grandfather.
If the Japanese people wish to idolize her and make her the Empress who are we to deny their wishes?
Agreed on her not being responsible for the sins of her grandfather, but it's kinda fucked up that her grandfather was allowed to keep ruling after WWII, rather than being replaced by a family member or something.
Blame Douglas McArthur, he came up with the idea of keeping her grandfather as Emperor and he made sure to exclude any evidence that could be used to try him for war crimes.
I mean... yes, thats true, buts it more complicated than that.
At the end of WW2, elements within the Japanese military and government executed an ultranationalist coup attempt.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ky%C5%ABj%C5%8D_incident
In broad strokes, the Emperor was planning to surrender, after the Potsdam Conference, after the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, after the Soviet Union declared war on Japan.
A significant number of military higher ups, many various officers... decided that was bullshit, and concocted a plan to take the Imperial family hostage, destroy the Emperor's recorded speech that was to announce the surrender and urge all Japanese people to actually surrender.
This plan ended up failing, but maybe now you can see that significant portions of the Japanese military wanted to keep fighting, literally to death.
So, if you're trying to make sure that something like this coup does not reoccur in the years following surrender... it makes some sense to try and support the people who wanted to comply with you, wanted to end the war, who would and actually could ensure stability.
Consider an alternative example.
Iraq, 2003-6.
The US basically just wholesale dismantles the Iraqi government, including its military, which was a significant source of employment for a lot of people.
Those former Iraqi military members then go on to be a very significant, effective and capable element of the Iraqi "Insurgency"/Resistance, for... what, 10, 15 years?
Can you not imagine something like that playing out in Japan, up into the 1960s?
I'm not trying to endorse or defend anybody's policies or actions here... I'm just trying to point out that it's more complicated than how you summarize it.
Hey, that's actually pretty interesting, thank you!
There is a pretty damned good movie that climaxes with the Kyujo Incident, called "The Emperor In August", came out in 2015.
It's basically the Japanese equivalent of "Downfall".
Its genuinely an intense and gripping story, nearly unbelievable story, ... it's fucking insane, and its more insane because that movie is quite historically accurate.
A lot of the minute details of what happened actually were recorded in significant detail, so ... there's really a minimal level of 'artistic intepretation'.
Maximum possible recommend seeing this movie.
I'll take a look. Arr!
Osu-!
Reality is always more complicated than a snap take by a arm chair quarterback.
Same for the fascists and mafia in Italy, they weren't purged because communists bad
Yea let’s just do the exact same thing again. Surely the outcome will be different this time! Let’s gamble hundreds of millions of lives on it!
Abolish all monarchies!
Whilst I agree in principle (since hereditary monarchies are inherently anti-meritocratic), there is actually a strong argument for constitutional and apolitical figurehead monarchs (i.e mostly powerless). They serve as something of an antidote to cults of personality and can also act as a uniting force in times of crisis.
They also print money from tourism. That usually the real reason to keep them around.
Do they? It's not like the palaces and fancy hats just vanish if you abolish the institution. The tourists will come anyway, there's no king in the Versailles palace and it's still a major tourist attraction.
The French got rid of their monarchy, and yet Versailles gets more visitors than Buckingham palace.
There are better ways to counter a cult of personality than a cult of divine providence.
Japanese conservative monarchists are wild.
Look up the Google Maps reviews of the imperial palace. For some context, the majority of the imperial palace is completely off limits to the general public (in stark contrast to most developed countries), and the royal family does a new years greeting.
The reviews are monarchists unironically saying things like that they travelled for days, lined up for hours, caught a glimpse of one of the royal family, were temporarily transported to heaven, and will dedicate their lives hoping for the forever prosperity of the royal family.
So they're like maga
And that is the mechanism the major religions exploit. Or monarchies. Or both.
I guess they missed the memo on how their monarchs aren't actually divine, or maybe they really, really, REALLY want to keep that tradition alive. Could be both, too, or other reasons.
were temporarily transported to heaven
Makes sense, the japanese monarchy is one of the few that still claims divinity and Shintoism still says they should be venerated.
Aiko has gained admirers since debuting as an adult royal in 2021, when she impressed the public as intelligent, friendly, caring and funny.
Oh yeah? The Spanish princess is learning to fly fighter jets:
Live action Porco Rosso is looking rather different
TIL that Japan has royal family.
And their dinasty at least dates back to the 6th century
It was the one term of their surrender.
Abolish monarchies