this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
88 points (97.8% liked)

Fediverse

37990 readers
325 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mastodon next release features

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I wish they implement hashtags lists

Was requested 4 years ago with over 300 possitive reaction

https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/7692

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, so the good idea from Bluesky of Starter Packs is now fully in Mastodon. I know that repost-quotes are in too, which is fun.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I wanted to like Google+, but the way they forced it into YouTube ticked me off.

[–] ByteMe@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I remember being 13 and just wanting to use YouTube but I had to have google+ 🤷

Wait, you didn't just set up a second account that had a 1970 birthdate?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago

I'm actually astonished that Google has only ever dipped their toes in social media.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 4 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Cool, let me know when they remove character limits and figure out how to apply language filters to hashtags.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Character limits are a feature, not a bug. I liked the limit of 160 characters (with tags) on Twitter. It's because of SMS, but called for brevity and clarity.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Except it's meaningless because if people want to put more than that they just create a "thread" of posts that I then break my brain trying to reassemble. They do nothing but make the experience worse.

It also creates turmoil because people aren't actually able to explain themselves properly.

Also why does it tag everyone involved in the conversation automatically in every post? Why is that necessary?

It's just stupid on a fundamental level, sorry.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Threads in microblogs baffle me too. Doubly if replies occur mid-thread. Tagging should be limited to the person being replied to and the OP, not everyone.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

There's no automatic tagging necessary at all. Like you just replied to me, without a tag, and I got a notification in my inbox. There's no need to tag OP or anyone else in this thread unless your reply pertains to them, in which case you can tag them manually.

Now my inbox isn't filled with a bunch of irrelevant nonsense to sift through and the comments aren't filled with a dozen pointless tags.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 5 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Isn't character limits an instance setting?

[–] Jayjader@jlai.lu 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It is, but maybe they mean they want no limit whatsoever on post length.

which, well, if your instance starts sending out megabyte-sized text posts I don't expect it to stay federated with many others for very long.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 2 points 10 hours ago

I mean, just set the limit to a ridiculously high number then? I'm not aware that Lemmy has any in-built limits, but I could be wrong.

I believe that Mastodon instances with limits only link to external posts that exceed the limit, they don't display the whole post.

Of course you can always run into network limits if you get huge posts, but that applies to everything and doesn't have anything in particular to do with Mastodon.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

You can modify the code but there's no "setting" in vanilla Mastodon. The request has been denied by Mr. Rochko himself.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 hours ago

i would love them to give us nuclear blocking that actually works across all instances (granted there are less jerks on fediverse but it doesn't hurt to plan)